確認偏誤
维基百科，自由的百科全书
確認偏誤（或稱確認偏差、證實偏差、肯證偏誤、驗證性偏見）是個人選擇性地回憶、蒐集有利細節，忽略不利或矛盾的資訊，來支持自己已有的想法的片面詮釋。[1][2]
這種偏見尤其顯見於感情問題和傳統觀念。例如，當談及槍支管制問題時，人們常偏好支持自己原立場的觀點，也傾向將模稜兩可的事實做有利於自己的解釋。偏見的搜索、理解和回憶，常被用來說明態度極化（即使爭論雙方都依附於相同的根據，爭執仍變得極端）、信念固著（在反證出現後依然堅信原有看法）、非理性首因效應（即強烈的「先入為主」效應）及錯覺相關（對二件偶然事件做無根據的連結的傾向）等現象。
參見 [编辑]
註腳 [编辑]
- ^ Plous（1993年），第233頁
- ^ 郑丽玉. 心理學. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司. 2006: 283– [17 January 2013]. ISBN 978-957-11-4381-1.
參考文獻 [编辑]
- Baron, Jonathan, Thinking and deciding. 3rd, New York: Cambridge University Press. 2000, ISBN 0521650305, OCLC 316403966
- Fine, Cordelia, A Mind of its Own: how your brain distorts and deceives, Cambridge, UK: Icon books. 2006, ISBN 1840466782, OCLC 60668289
- Friedrich, James, Primary error detection and minimization (PEDMIN) strategies in social cognition: a reinterpretation of confirmation bias phenomena, Psychological Review. American Psychological Association. 1993, 100 (2): 298–319, doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.298, ISSN 0033-295X, PMID 8483985
- Goldacre, Ben, Bad Science, London: Fourth Estate. 2008, ISBN 9780007240197, OCLC 259713114
- Hergovich, Andreas; Schott, Reinhard; Burger, Christoph, Biased Evaluation of Abstracts Depending on Topic and Conclusion: Further Evidence of a Confirmation Bias Within Scientific Psychology, Current Psychology. 2010, 29: 188–209, doi:10.1007/s12144-010-9087-5
- Horrobin, David F., The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation, Journal of the American Medical Association. 1990, 263 (10): 1438–1441, doi:10.1001/jama.263.10.1438, PMID 2304222
- Kida, Thomas E., Don't believe everything you think: the 6 basic mistakes we make in thinking, Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books. 2006, ISBN 9781591024088, OCLC 63297791
- Koehler, Jonathan J., The influence of prior beliefs on scientific judgments of evidence quality, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1993, 56: 28–55, doi:10.1006/obhd.1993.1044
- Kunda, Ziva, Social Cognition: Making Sense of People, MIT Press. 1999, ISBN 9780262611435, OCLC 40618974
- Lewicka, Maria, Confirmation Bias: Cognitive Error or Adaptive Strategy of Action Control?//Kofta, Mirosław; Weary, Gifford; Sedek, Grzegorz, Personal control in action: cognitive and motivational mechanisms, Springer. 1998: 233–255, ISBN 9780306457203, OCLC 39002877
- Maccoun, Robert J., Biases in the interpretation and use of research results, Annual Review of Psychology. 1998, 49: 259–87, doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.259, PMID 15012470
- Mahoney, Michael J., Publication prejudices: an experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system, Cognitive Therapy and Research. 1977, 1: 161–175, doi:10.1007/BF01173636
- Nickerson, Raymond S., Confirmation Bias; A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises, Review of General Psychology. Educational Publishing Foundation. 1998, 2 (2): 175–220, doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175, ISSN 1089-2680
- Oswald, Margit E.; Grosjean, Stefan, Confirmation Bias//Pohl, Rüdiger F., Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgement and Memory, Hove, UK: Psychology Press. 2004: 79–96, ISBN 9781841693514, OCLC 55124398
- Plous, Scott, The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making, McGraw-Hill. 1993, ISBN 9780070504776, OCLC 26931106
- Poletiek, Fenna, Hypothesis-testing behaviour, Hove, UK: Psychology Press. 2001, ISBN 9781841691596, OCLC 44683470
- Risen, Jane; Gilovich, Thomas, Informal Logical Fallacies//Sternberg, Robert J.; Roediger III, Henry L.; Halpern, Diane F., Critical Thinking in Psychology, Cambridge University Press. 2007: 110–130, ISBN 9780521608343, OCLC 69423179
- Vyse, Stuart A., Believing in magic: The psychology of superstition, New York: Oxford University Press. 1997, ISBN 0195136349, OCLC 35025826
