| 案件名
|
引用
|
簡介
|
| United States v. Phellis
|
257 U.S. 156 (1921)
|
shares in a subsidiary corporation issued to stockholders in the parent corporation considered taxable income
|
| 萊瑟訴加內特案
|
258 U.S. 130 (1922)
|
constitutionality of Nineteenth Amendment
|
| 巴爾扎克訴波多黎各案
|
258 U.S. 298 (1922)
|
海島案
|
| 美國訴莫蘭德案
|
258 U.S. 433 (1922)
|
第五憲法修正案
|
| 童工稅案
|
259 U.S. 20 (1922)
|
docket title Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co., found the Child Labor Tax Law of 1919 was not a valid use of Congress' power under the Taxing and Spending Clause
|
| Hill v. Wallace
|
259 U.S. 44 (1922)
|
use of congressional taxing power under the Taxing and Spending Clause; relationship to Commerce Clause
|
| 聯邦棒球俱樂部訴全國聯賽案
|
259 U.S. 200 (1922)
|
棒球和反托拉斯管理
|
| 懷俄明州訴科羅拉多州案
|
259 U.S. 419 (1922)
|
科羅拉多州是否可以轉移跨州水系拉勒米河的水資源
|
| 高雄小澤訴合眾國案
|
260 U.S. 178 (1922)
|
規劃和種族（日裔美國人）
|
| 賓夕法尼亞煤炭公司訴馬洪案
|
260 U.S. 393 (1922)
|
Substantive Due Process, Takings clause of the Fifth Amendment
|
| 摩爾訴登普西案
|
261 U.S. 86 (1923)
|
mob-dominated trials, federal writ of habeas corpus, due process
|
| United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind
|
261 U.S. 204 (1923)
|
歸化和種族（印度裔美國人）
|
| 阿德金斯訴兒童醫院案
|
261 U.S. 525 (1923)
|
定約自由；最低公司法
|
| 巴爾的摩和俄亥俄鐵路公司訴合眾國案
|
261 U.S. 592 (1923)
|
creation of implied-in-fact contracts
|
| 芝加哥市貿易委員會訴奧爾森案
|
262 U.S. 1 (1923)
|
constitutionality of the Grain Futures Act under the Commerce Clause
|
| Meyer v. Nebraska
|
262 U.S. 390 (1923)
|
constitutionality of law prohibiting teaching of foreign languages; substantive due process
|
| Frothingham v. Mellon
|
262 U.S. 447 (1923)
|
納稅人標準被廢棄
|
| Rindge Co. v. County of Los Angeles
|
262 U.S. 700 (1923)
|
eminent domain and the building of a scenic road
|
| Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
|
263 U.S. 413 (1923)
|
review of state court decisions by U.S. District Courts
|
| Chung Fook v. White
|
264 U.S. 443 (1924)
|
Interpretation of Immigration Act of 1917; marked end of era of strict plain meaning interpretation of statutes
|
| United States v. Ninety-Five Barrels (More or Less) Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar
|
265 U.S. 438 (1924)
|
legality of misleading but factually accurate packaging statements under the Pure Food and Drug Act
|
| 卡羅爾訴合眾國案
|
267 U.S. 132 (1925)
|
whether police searches of automobiles without a warrant violate the Fourth Amendment
|
| George W. Bush & Sons Co. v. Maloy
|
267 U.S. 317 (1925)
|
Dormant Commerce Clause; states are not permitted to regulate common carriers engaged in interstate commerce on state highways
|
| 林德訴合眾國案
|
268 U.S. 5 (1925)
|
prosecution of physicians under the Harrison Narcotics Tax Act
|
| Irwin v. Gavit
|
268 U.S. 161 (1925)
|
taxation of income from a trust
|
| Pierce v. Society of Sisters
|
268 U.S. 510 (1925)
|
私隱
|
| 吉特洛訴紐約州案
|
268 U.S. 652 (1925)
|
prosecution of seditious speech
|
| Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co.
|
271 U.S. 170 (1926)
|
taxation of reduced loss on exchanged currency
|
| 邁爾斯訴合眾國案
|
272 U.S. 52 (1926)
|
Presidential authority to remove executive branch officials
|
| Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co.
|
272 U.S. 365 (1926)
|
zoning, due process
|
| 美國訴通用電氣公司案
|
272 U.S. 476 (1926)
|
patentee who grants a single license to a competitor to manufacture the patented product may lawfully fix the price at which the licensee may sell the product
|
| Farrington v. Tokushige
|
273 U.S. 284 (1927)
|
constitutionality of anti-foreign language statute in the Territory of Hawaii under the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment
|
| 尼克遜訴赫爾頓案
|
273 U.S. 536 (1927)
|
challenging the white primaries in Texas
|
| 巴克訴貝爾案
|
274 U.S. 200 (1927)
|
compulsory sterilization, eugenics
|
| Hess v. Pawloski
|
274 U.S. 352 (1927)
|
consent to in personam jurisdiction
|
| 惠特尼訴加利福尼亞州案
|
274 U.S. 357 (1927)
|
prosecution of criminal syndicalism
|
| Gong Lum v. Rice
|
275 U.S. 78 (1927)
|
admission of Chinese girl to school for White children in Mississippi
|
| 新墨西哥州訴德克薩斯州案
|
275 U.S. 279 (1927)
|
兩州邊界之爭
|
| Miller v. Schoene
|
276 U.S. 272 (1928)
|
Substantive due process, takings clause
|
| Black and White Taxicab Co. v. Brown and Yellow Taxicab Co.
|
276 U.S. 518 (1928)
|
what law is to be applied when courts sit in diversity jurisdiction
|
| Olmstead v. United States
|
277 U.S. 438 (1928)
|
admissibility of illegally-obtained phone wiretaps as evidence
|
| 威斯康星州訴伊利諾伊州案
|
278 U.S. 367 (1930)
|
federal power over state interests, Chicago Sanitary Canal
|
| 塔夫脫訴鮑爾斯案
|
278 U.S. 470 (1929)
|
taxation of a gift of shares of stock under the Sixteenth Amendment (Chief Justice Taft did not participate)
|
| United States v. Schwimmer
|
279 U.S. 644 (1929)
|
denial of naturalization to a pacifist, overruled by Girouard v. United States (1946)
|
| Pocket Veto Case
|
279 U.S. 655 (1929)
|
constitutionality of the pocket veto
|
| Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner
|
279 U.S. 716 (1929)
|
third-party payment of income tax, effect of Revenue Act of 1926
|
