• V&A item ID：​O195230 
• 《 100副照片：有史以來最具影響力的圖像》  

	本作品創作於古巴，由於其版權期限已過，現歸入公共領域。根據古巴法律#14及隨後的修正案，古巴的版權條款如下：
材料類型 版權在古巴已過期，如果... 如果...¹，版權在美國已過期 照片 使用超過25年 1972年2月20日之前在古巴首次出版但未遵守美國版權手續 匿名作品（非照片） 使用超過50年 1947年2月20日之前在古巴首次出版，未遵守美國版權手續在古巴使用 企業和政府工作 從不（永久版權） 發表於1929年（95年前） 所有其他作品 從作者去世後的1月1日算起，已經過去了50多年 a)在古巴出版，未遵守美國版權手續，作者在1947年之前去世或b)在1929年之前出版（95年前）
註1：要在維基共享資源上托管檔案，它必須在古巴和美國都屬於公共領域。
¹ 一部作品要在美國成為公有領域，其版權必須在古巴於1997年2月20日加入伯爾尼公約之前在古巴過期。
註2：儘管有上述條件，古巴國家可以決定在作品創作者的版權期限屆滿時將作品的版權轉讓給古巴版權法的48º條款。此類作品並非沒有版權，並且可能隨時被刪除。 English ∙ 日本語 ∙ русский ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

免責聲明 本圖像（或其中包含的符號）在以下國家受法律所禁止，原因是有關符號（以各種方式）表現共產主義、社會主義或類似的政體；或與其相關的政黨/組織：格魯吉亞、拉脫維亞、立陶宛（由憲法法庭通過的行政違法法典第18818條）、烏克蘭（刑法第436-1條）、匈牙利（2012年刑法C章第335節）和印度尼西亞。 此外，在韓國使用朝鮮勞動黨標識或會違反《國家保安法》。 所涉及的符號包括鐮刀與鎚子維基百科、紅星、徽章標誌、旗幟以及領導人照片。

This file is in the public domain. The photo was used for the first time internationally in 1967. It is in the public domain by Decree Law no. 156, September 28, 1994, to amend part of Law no. 14 December 28, 1977, Copyright Act (Article 47) which states that the pictures fall into the public domain Worldwide, 25 years after its first use.

Cuba did not sign the Berne Convention until 1997, and this photo was taken and publicized 30 years before that and thus is in the public domain.

• This includes being in the Public Domain in the United States - Since the image was first published in Cuba without compliance of US copyright formalities and used in Cuba before February 20, 1972.

Of importance yes it is true that Alberto Korda sued that vodka maker Smirnoff based on his "moral rights" (under the belief that Che Guevara wouldn't support alcohol) that are independent of copyright status, while also attempting to obtain copyright ownership of the photograph. Although moral rights are not recognized in the U.S. - they are recognized through most of the World and part of international copyright law. Moral rights are included in Berne Convention, so if the photographer is still alive, he still can sue, even if the picture is public domain. However, the moral rights are not transferable, and when Korda died 2001, no one can control the use of the picture anymore under that premise. As to his desire to show he was the rightful owner of the Copyright for the image, that was never decided upon in court as the Case of (Korda v. Lintas & Rex) was settled "sensibly and amicably" out of court.

As Ariana Hernández-Reguant contends in (Copyrighting Che: Art and Authorship under Cuban Late Socialism Public Culture 2004 v. 16 pp. 1-30.) ~ "There was never any official ruling on whether the depiction constituted a violation of copyright." (pg 4). The author goes on to state that: ~ "Korda took the picture while working for a state-run newspaper, his actual property rights would be questionable under both Cuban and international law." (pg 4)

Of note as well before the photographer of the photo died, in reference to the image becoming a ubiquitous worldwide symbol, he also stated “As a supporter of the ideals for which Che Guevara died, I am not averse to its reproduction by those who wish to propagate his memory” — Korda [1]

ADDENDUM OF SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

All quotations come verbatim from ~ A Copyright Revolution: Protecting the Famous Photograph of Che Guevara, by Sarah Levy, 13 Law and Business Review of the Americas, Am. 687. Summer of 2007.

LEGALLY

• "The Berne Convention, which 160 countries have signed, states in article 7(4) that "it shall be a matter for legislation in the countries of the Union to determine the term of protection of photographic works."
• "The Universal Copyright Convention does not require protection for photographs."
• "In 1994, the World Trade Organization (WTO) implemented the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (TRIPS), which allows the 150 WTO member countries to exclude photographs from the realm of protection provided for intellectual property."

IN CUBA

• "The first jurisdiction of relevance is Cuban law because Cuba is both the location where the photograph originated and the domicile of the photographer."
• "General copyright protection under Cuban law lasts for photographs retain copyright protection for only ten years from the date the work is first used. After the copyright expires, the Council of Ministers can declare the work as property of the State."
• "It seems that in Cuba the copyright protection in Korda's Guevara photograph would have already expired, and despite the claims of ownership from Korda's heirs, the State would now hold any rights associated with the photograph."

IN THE U.S.

• "A U.S. district court recently noted that "there is no uniform test to determine the copyright ability of photographs."
• "Under both the 1909 U.S. Copyright Act and the current act, in the absence of a will, courts determine the proper disposition of a copyright interest in accordance with the intestate succession law of the decedent's domicile. This holds true even if the decedent's domicile is in a foreign country. Korda was domiciled in Havana, Cuba."

IN THE FUTURE

• "Furthermore, the question of ownership is a significant factor in determining not only the transferability of the copyright protection but also the duration of that protection within different jurisdictions. A comparison of the relevant laws of Cuba, the United States, and treaties adhered to by the international community shows a variety of possible results when looking at the protection afforded to the Korda photograph."
• "It remains to be seen what the result would be in the United States."
• "The outcome of future litigation hinges upon the duration of protection available within a jurisdiction."