描述Press Photo of Fred Rogers (Published by 1982) (cropped).png	English: Press photo of Fred Rogers.
日期	Published by 1982 In "eBay (v1)", the photo caption mentions the program "Mister Rogers Talks with Parents about Discipline" in the future tense. According to the Neighborhood Archive, the program aired on February 28, 1982.
來源	eBay (v1): front. back eBay (v2): front, back eBay (v3): front, back Image source: PopSugar
作者	Terry Arthur (given in "eBay (v1)")
其他版本	本檔案提取自另一個檔案 ：​Press Photo of Fred Rogers (Published by 1982).png

The press photo of "eBay (v1)" and "eBay (v2)" do not have a copyright notice.

According to The Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices: Chapter 2200 § 2204.1 at p. 4:

In the case of a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work, the year of publication may be omitted if the work is reproduced on greeting cards, postcards, stationery, jewelry, dolls, toys, or any useful article.

The U.S. Copyright Office defines useful article as follows:

A “useful article” is an object having an intrinsic utilitar¡an function that is not merely to portray the appearance of the article or to convey information. Examples are clothing, furniture, machinery, dinnerware, and lighting fixtures. An article that is normally part of a useful article may itself be a useful article, for example, an ornamental wheel cover on a vehicle.

The photo in "eBay (v3)" is not reproduced on any such articles. Thus the answer is yes.

According to The Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices: Chapter 2200 § 2205.1(E) at p. 9:

A year of publication that is separated from the rest of the notice may be acceptable if it is an appropriate date and if it is reasonably identifiable as part of the notice. For example, an appropriate year of publication may be acceptable if it is the only date that appears on the same page as the other elements of the notice.

Likewise, a year of publication that is prominently displayed elsewhere on copies or phonorecords may be acceptable if it is an appropriate date and if it can reasonably be considered part of the notice. For instance, the U.S. Copyright Office may accept a date that appears in the “Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data” or in the year of issue for a periodical, even if the date does not appear on the same page as the rest of the notice.

In those cases where a year is required and no year of publication can be reasonably identified as part of the notice, the Office will consider the work to be published without notice.

The stamp may have been placed without the authorization of the copyright owner and may not have been originally part of the photo when it was distributed. For example, the stamp may have been placed by a librarian to place a check-out date before a patron borrowed it. Thus no year of publication can be reasonably identified as part of the notice. Therefore the work was published without a copyright notice.

A search for "Mister Rogers' Neighborhood" and "Terry Arthur" (the photographer) in the Copyright Record for 1978 to present yields no relevant results. Thus the answer is no.

本作品屬於公有領域，是因為該作品於1978年至1989年3月1日間於美國發表且不帶著作權聲明，其著作權在5年內沒有持續在美國著作權局登記。但除非該作品作者已經過世多年，否則在對於美國作品不適用較短期限法則的國家和地區仍受著作權保護，如加拿大（過世後50年）、中國大陸（過世後50年，不含港澳地區）、德國（過世後70年）、墨西哥（過世後100年）、瑞士（過世後70年），以及其他有本地條約的國家。更多解釋請參閱這個頁面。 Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−