跳转到内容

File:97% of Climate Scientists Confirm Anthroprogenic Global Warming.svg

页面内容不支持其他语言。
这个文件来自维基共享资源
维基百科,自由的百科全书

原始文件 (SVG文件,尺寸为3,010 × 2,420像素,文件大小:7 KB)


摘要

 
W3C-validity not checked.
描述
English: Graphic representation of 97–98%

The figure is based on Doran 2009 and Anderegg 2010 studies.

Doran & Zimmerman 2009 study:

http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf

Anderegg et al. 2010 study:

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.full.pdf en:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

http://www.pnas.org/content/suppl/2010/06/07/1003187107.DCSupplemental/pnas.201003187SI.pdf

The first study (Doran & Zimmerman 2009) is a survey with 2 questions. In the first question, 96.4% of "climatologists who are active publishers on climate change" agree that mean global temperatures have risen "compared with pre-1800s levels" (compared with before the 1550-1850 A.D. Little Ice Age ended). In the second question, 97.4% (75 of 77) agree that human activity "is a significant contributing factor" in temperature change. The study concludes the distribution of answers to its survey questions implies that debate on the "role played by human activity is largely nonexistent" amongst climate experts.

According to the second study (Anderegg et al. 2010), there are only 2% to 3% UE ("unconvinced by the evidence") disagreeing scientists amongst a group of 50 to 200 climate researchers ranked as top. Expertise was defined as determined by the number of articles published by climate journals. The top 50 scientists considered CE ("convinced by the evidence") wrote an average of 408 articles each which were successfully published.

Scientists were counted as UE if having signed a public "statement strongly dissenting from the views of the IPCC." That resulted in a list of 472 UE scientists, of whom 1 was in the top 50 ("2% of the top 50 climate researchers") as defined by the publication-number ranking system.

Scientists were counted as CE ("convinced by the evidence") when in the list of those credited by the IPCC as having done research utilized by AR4 Working Group I. That resulted in a list of 619 names, which, after adjusting for duplication, became a total of 903 when also adding in those who signed one of several statements supporting the IPCC.
日期
来源 自己的作品. Original source: "Skeptical Science" blog, 11 May 2011 by John Cook
作者 Sagredo
其他版本 File:Ratio_of_publishing_climate_scientists_who_believe_humans_are_warming_the_planet.jpg

许可协议

我,本作品著作权人,特此采用以下许可协议发表本作品:
w:zh:知识共享
署名 相同方式共享
您可以自由地:
  • 共享 – 复制、发行并传播本作品
  • 修改 – 改编作品
惟须遵守下列条件:
  • 署名 – 您必须对作品进行署名,提供授权条款的链接,并说明是否对原始内容进行了更改。您可以用任何合理的方式来署名,但不得以任何方式表明许可人认可您或您的使用。
  • 相同方式共享 – 如果您再混合、转换或者基于本作品进行创作,您必须以与原先许可协议相同或相兼容的许可协议分发您贡献的作品。

说明

添加一行文字以描述该文件所表现的内容

此文件中描述的项目

描绘内容

image/svg+xml

21a0014013f3f54b9462ade8a7f013e4ed147b0a

7,375 字节

2,420 像素

3,010 像素

文件历史

点击某个日期/时间查看对应时刻的文件。

日期/时间缩⁠略⁠图大小用户备注
当前2019年7月30日 (二) 14:472019年7月30日 (二) 14:47版本的缩略图3,010 × 2,420(7 KB)Habitator terraecorr for firefox // Editing SVG source code using c:User:Rillke/SVGedit.js
2012年8月10日 (五) 21:422012年8月10日 (五) 21:42版本的缩略图3,010 × 2,420(7 KB)NigeljReverted to version as of 22:10, 10 July 2012: valiant attempt at file-size reduction by Magasjukur2, but our renderer produces very blurred versions at low, 'thumb' resolutions.
2012年7月10日 (二) 23:402012年7月10日 (二) 23:40版本的缩略图3,010 × 2,420(1 KB)Magasjukur2Simplified using <pattern>
2012年7月10日 (二) 22:102012年7月10日 (二) 22:10版本的缩略图3,010 × 2,420(7 KB)Nigeljsimplify path that defines the figure
2012年2月26日 (日) 23:102012年2月26日 (日) 23:10版本的缩略图3,010 × 2,420(13 KB)NigeljOops, markup wasn't valid. Add required xmlns declaration
2012年2月26日 (日) 22:572012年2月26日 (日) 22:57版本的缩略图3,010 × 2,420(13 KB)Nigelj(1) Simplify SVG markup (2) Increase outline width for visibility (3) Both places where this file is used in articles, it illustrates "97–98%", so make 97th figure grey.
2012年2月25日 (六) 21:402012年2月25日 (六) 21:40版本的缩略图3,097 × 2,333(658 KB)Sagredo

全域文件用途

元数据