資本主義和平

資本主義和平（英文: Capitalist Peace）又稱資本主義和平論（英文: Capitalist Peace Theory）、商業和平（英文: Commercial Peace）和商業自由主義（英文: Commercial Liberalism）。該理論認為市場開放有助於建構國家之間更和平的關係，原因是發達的市場導向型經濟體不太可能相互衝突^[1]。與民主和平論和制度主義的和平論證一起，商業和平構成了康德和平三腳架的一部分^[2]。商業和平的重要機制圍繞著資本主義、貿易相互依存和資本相互依存如何提高戰爭成本的相關觀點，這些觀點宣稱商業自由主義遊説團體會説服公眾反對戰爭，使領導人更難發動戰爭，並且減少征戰所帶來的經濟利益^[3]。

學術界一直在爭論商業和平論的證據和理據的有效性，以及該理論背後的機制^[4]^[5]^[6]。根據埃裡克·加茨克（Erik Gartzke）和張佳坤（Jiakun Jack Zhang）所提出的說法，關於經濟相互依存與衝突之間關係的證據尚無定論^[7]。

參考資料

^ Mansfield, Edward D. Pevehouse, Jon C. W; Seabrooke, Leonard , 編. International Trade and Conflict. The Oxford Handbook of International Political Economy. 2021. ISBN 978-0-19-879351-9. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198793519.013.27. （原始內容存檔於2021-05-15）（英語）.
^ Russett, Bruce; Oneal, John R.; Davis, David R. The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950-85. International Organization. 1998, 52 (3): 441–467 [2023-07-09]. ISSN 0020-8183. JSTOR 2601398. S2CID 153665709. doi:10.1162/002081898550626. （原始內容存檔於2022-01-10）.
^ Poast, Paul. Beyond the "Sinew of War": The Political Economy of Security as a Subfield. Annual Review of Political Science. 2019, 22 (1): 223–239. ISSN 1094-2939. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070912  （英語）.
^ Mousseau, Michael. The End of War: How a Robust Marketplace and Liberal Hegemony Are Leading to Perpetual World Peace. International Security. 2019, 44 (1): 160–196. ISSN 0162-2889. S2CID 198952369. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00352.
^ Copeland, Dale C. Economic Interdependence and War. Princeton University Press. 2015: 1–25 [2023-07-09]. ISBN 978-0-691-16159-4. JSTOR j.ctt7ztkw2. （原始內容存檔於2022-11-15）.
^ Farrell, Henry; Newman, Abraham L. Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion. International Security. 2019-07-01, 44 (1): 42–79. ISSN 0162-2889. S2CID 198952367. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00351 .
^ Gartzke, Erik; Zhang, Jiakun Jack. Trade and War. The Oxford Handbook of the Political Economy of International Trade. 2015. ISBN 978-0-19-998175-5. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199981755.013.27. （原始內容存檔於2016-05-21）（英語）.

外部連結

[1] Mansfield, Edward D. Pevehouse, Jon C. W; Seabrooke, Leonard , 編. International Trade and Conflict. The Oxford Handbook of International Political Economy. 2021. ISBN 978-0-19-879351-9. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198793519.013.27. （原始內容存檔於2021-05-15）（英語）.

[:4-2] Russett, Bruce; Oneal, John R.; Davis, David R. The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950-85. International Organization. 1998, 52 (3): 441–467 [2023-07-09]. ISSN 0020-8183. JSTOR 2601398. S2CID 153665709. doi:10.1162/002081898550626. （原始內容存檔於2022-01-10）.

[3] Poast, Paul. Beyond the "Sinew of War": The Political Economy of Security as a Subfield. Annual Review of Political Science. 2019, 22 (1): 223–239. ISSN 1094-2939. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070912  （英語）.

[:0-4] Mousseau, Michael. The End of War: How a Robust Marketplace and Liberal Hegemony Are Leading to Perpetual World Peace. International Security. 2019, 44 (1): 160–196. ISSN 0162-2889. S2CID 198952369. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00352.

[:3-5] Copeland, Dale C. Economic Interdependence and War. Princeton University Press. 2015: 1–25 [2023-07-09]. ISBN 978-0-691-16159-4. JSTOR j.ctt7ztkw2. （原始內容存檔於2022-11-15）.

[:8-6] Farrell, Henry; Newman, Abraham L. Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion. International Security. 2019-07-01, 44 (1): 42–79. ISSN 0162-2889. S2CID 198952367. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00351 .

[7] Gartzke, Erik; Zhang, Jiakun Jack. Trade and War. The Oxford Handbook of the Political Economy of International Trade. 2015. ISBN 978-0-19-998175-5. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199981755.013.27. （原始內容存檔於2016-05-21）（英語）.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]