Talk:獨裁者賽局
外观
![]() | 本條目有内容譯自英語維基百科页面“Dictator game”(原作者列于其历史记录页)。 |
翻译问题
[编辑]- 本词条翻译自en:Dictator game,鉴于本人非经济学专业,如有错误请指正。
- 本词条英文版的隐藏内容质疑的原文内容被翻译为如下:
”用独裁者博弈的不同实验结果以支持或者反对经济学中的理性概念,并非是一种被广泛接受的想法。”
质疑段落的英文原文在此:
- The idea that the highly mixed results <!-- what 'highly mixed results'? up to this point, the article does not portray the results as 'highly mixed,' but simply (largely) unanticipated; this seems to be an unwarranted inflection point -->of the dictator game prove or disprove rationality in economics is not widely accepted. Results offer both support of the classical assumptions and notable exception which have led to improved holistic economic models of behavior. Some authors have suggested that giving in the dictator game does not entail that individuals wish to maximize others' benefit (altruism). Instead they suggest that individuals have some negative utility associated with being seen as greedy, and are avoiding this judgment by the experimenter. Some experiments have been performed to test this hypothesis with mixed results.[1][2]
- 质疑内容:
- what 'highly mixed results'? up to this point, the article does not portray the results as 'highly mixed,' but simply (largely) unanticipated; this seems to be an unwarranted inflection point.
若翻译或处理不佳,请指正!
--Unravel17(留言) 2018年1月25日 (四) 16:34 (UTC)
- ^ Hoffman, Elizabeth; McCabe, Kevin; Shachat, Keith; Smith, Vernon. Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games. Games and Economic Behavior. 1994-11-01, 7 (3): 346–380. doi:10.1006/game.1994.1056.
- ^ Bolton, Gary E.; Katok, Elena; Zwick, Rami. Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness. International Journal of Game Theory: 269–299. ISSN 0020-7276. doi:10.1007/s001820050072 (英语).