討論:獨裁者賽局

頁面內容不支援其他語言。
維基百科,自由的百科全書

翻譯問題[編輯]

  1. 本詞條翻譯自en:Dictator game,鑑於本人非經濟學專業,如有錯誤請指正。
  2. 本詞條英文版的隱藏內容質疑的原文內容被翻譯為如下:

」用獨裁者博弈的不同實驗結果以支持或者反對經濟學中的理性概念,並非是一種被廣泛接受的想法。」

質疑段落的英文原文在此:

The idea that the highly mixed results <!-- what 'highly mixed results'? up to this point, the article does not portray the results as 'highly mixed,' but simply (largely) unanticipated; this seems to be an unwarranted inflection point -->of the dictator game prove or disprove rationality in economics is not widely accepted. Results offer both support of the classical assumptions and notable exception which have led to improved holistic economic models of behavior. Some authors have suggested that giving in the dictator game does not entail that individuals wish to maximize others' benefit (altruism). Instead they suggest that individuals have some negative utility associated with being seen as greedy, and are avoiding this judgment by the experimenter. Some experiments have been performed to test this hypothesis with mixed results.[1][2]
質疑內容:
what 'highly mixed results'? up to this point, the article does not portray the results as 'highly mixed,' but simply (largely) unanticipated; this seems to be an unwarranted inflection point.

若翻譯或處理不佳,請指正!

--Unravel17留言2018年1月25日 (四) 16:34 (UTC)[回覆]

  1. ^ Hoffman, Elizabeth; McCabe, Kevin; Shachat, Keith; Smith, Vernon. Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games. Games and Economic Behavior. 1994-11-01, 7 (3): 346–380. doi:10.1006/game.1994.1056. 
  2. ^ Bolton, Gary E.; Katok, Elena; Zwick, Rami. Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness. International Journal of Game Theory: 269–299. ISSN 0020-7276. doi:10.1007/s001820050072 (英語).