User:Sanmosa/沙盒
YouTube上的Armend Miftari - Mendi頻道
謝謝你美國(英語:Thank You USA)
Miftari, Armend. Thank You USA - Armend Miftari MENDI (Official Video). YouTube. 2014-04-19 [2023-04-07]. (原始内容存档于2023-03-31).
Singer: Armend Miftari MENDI
Music: Armend Miftari MENDI
Comp: Armend Miftari MENDI
Solo: ILIRI
REC: InArt Studio
Lyrics: Armend Miftari Mendi
en:2010 Kenyan constitutional referendum
部分封鎖所限制編輯的對象為IP區段,而非特定帳戶。此類封鎖並不經常意味被封鎖者有任何不當行徑。如你被封鎖,並且不認為自己有任何不當行徑,請參閱下方說明。我們可就此情形提供協助。 |
本頁簡而言之:封鎖不是懲罰,而是制止進一步扰乱的方法。被封鎖者應了解其被封鎖的原因,並說服管理員在其獲解除封鎖後不會進行擾亂。 |
維基百科管理員在日常運作中會例行公事地封鎖帳戶與IP區段,以減少或防止破壞等各種不當行為。此頁向被封鎖者解釋被封鎖的原因,以及如何請求解除封鎖。
被封鎖的原因[编辑]
如你的帳戶被錯誤地封鎖,在告知管理員後,你的帳戶很快就會獲解除封鎖。否則,其他獨立管理員將在快速的請求解除封鎖程序的框架下,對你的解除封鎖請求作快速審查與簡短討論。在某些情況下,封鎖的目的之一是確保用戶汲取教訓,並確保不會重蹈覆轍。
常見問題[编辑]
請先閱讀本章節。此處可能有你想問的問題的答案。 |
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
on your talk page, which is only blocked if abused. If you cannot edit your talk page, you can appeal via the Unblock Ticket Request System.
One common requirement for unblocking is to be able to answer the question, "do you understand that what you did was inappropriate for this site, and can we have your assurance that you won't do it again?"
In the case where blocks are applied with with a very short duration, especially for good cause, the usual response that you will receive from an unblock request is that it is denied, and that you'll just need to wait until it expires before you can resume editing. Once the block does expire, you'll be able to continue editing Wikipedia as you could before, and you can consider the block to be in the past – just make sure that you learn from what you did wrong. Repeated instances of inappropriate behavior or violations of policies or guidelines (especially when a block has been recently placed because of the same behavior) will often result in a block being applied with a duration that is longer than the previous block, so it is important to learn from blocks when they occur. Keep in mind that blocks are not intended to be punitive; they are used to prevent further disruption, and to help misplaced or misguided users when words, notices, messages, and warnings don't seem sufficient and are not causing the issue or disruption to stop.This can be minutes, hours – or indeed the user may never do so.
An indefinite block does not mean that you are "blocked forever". It simply means the blocking administrator did not set a time limit or expiration for the block. In this case, the blocked user will usually be required to appeal their block and discuss the matter with an administrator before an unblock will be considered. An indefinite block could be applied because the user needs to confirm that things are okay and that nothing's wrong, or it could be due to a problem that needs attention, or a problem that is deemed to need the user to acknowledge that they understand that a behavior was inappropriate first before they will be unblocked.
Typical examples are where the account owner must be contacted (e.g. suspected "hacking" of their account), and users whose behavior was severely inappropriate (such as making threats or engaging in the repeated use of personal attacks toward other editors, engaging in "outing", repeated instances of vandalism or edit warring, repeated incidents where the user has failed to listen, and other matters). Wikipedia is an encyclopedia community; its ability to exist as well as continue to be a significantly relevant and highly referenced resource on the internet is made possible because of the collective hard work and the amount of time that each member of the community gives to Wikipedia for free. Because of the importance and the impact that the community has with Wikipedia's continued sustainability and relevance on the internet, it is both a policy and a founding principle that members of the community must treat one other with respect and civility. Inappropriate or unacceptable behavior (such as those listed in the examples above) is not tolerated. For other issues, a user may need to stop, learn our site norms, and confirm they will not repeat the behavior (or will edit in accordance with certain conditions), before an unblock can take place.- Note: If your IP address is blocked, you may need to create your account at home, on another computer, phone or tablet using a different connection, or (in rare cases) in another country. You can also request that an account be created for you.
- Note: Many rotating IP addresses of ISPs practising shared IP addresses are blocked as being "proxies" or "zombies" because of the large number of different users sharing the IP. On these computers, logged-in users will be automatically blocked immediately. If you encounter such a case, please follow the unblocking request steps or consult a CheckUser or administrator.
請求解除封鎖[编辑]
The preferred way to appeal a block is to place {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
on your talk page, which is only blocked if abused. If you cannot edit your talk page, you can appeal via the Unblock Ticket Request System.
To test if you are still blocked, click here which tries to edit the Sandbox. If you are allowed to edit the sandbox, your block has already expired or been lifted and nothing more needs doing. If the block is still active, you can resume editing when unblocked, or you can request a review of the block if you believe it is unfair or that you have put right whatever was the problem. Note that this only checks for sitewide blocks, not partial blocks. Users can check for partial blocks by viewing their contributions page or by entering their name on the block list.
- Useful links for helping blocked users: Message seen by blocked users: MediaWiki:Blockedtext (partial blocks: MediaWiki:Blockedtext-partial) Requests for unblocking: Category:Requests for unblock
請求解除封鎖後[编辑]
When you appeal, other editors – most of whom probably have no involvement in the matter – will review your editing history, which has been logged, as well as the reason for the block and the history leading up to it. Editors may leave comments on your talk page regarding your appeal.
Usually, if it's a clear cut case, any uninvolved (independent) administrator will make a decision. The blocking administrator may be consulted for their comments on your request (this is a common courtesy). The process can take hours or a few days; for major discussions sometimes it can take a week or more.
Administrators will carefully avoid blocking and unblocking fights, which are a serious breach of administrator policy. For this reason, blocks will not usually be allowed to become a source of conflict; rather, consensus will be sought, by means of a fair and objective examination of the matter and of any policies alleged to have been breached.
解除封鎖請求的流程[编辑]
Blocks can be reversed with the agreement of the blocking admin, an override by other admins in the case that the block was clearly unjustifiable, or (in very rare cases) on appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
解除封鎖請求的類型[编辑]
In all cases, unblock requests should be submitted on your user talk page. Generally speaking, unblock requests will be one of the following two types:
- Requests for unblock in the event of a case of mistaken identity, misunderstanding, or other irregularity;
- Appeals for clemency, in which the appellant acknowledges the conduct that led to their block and requests a second chance.
If the appeal is of the first type, you should use the unblock template on your talk page or submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS). If you are partially blocked from using certain Wikipedia functions, you can also submit an appeal on the administrator noticeboard. If the appeal is of the second type, you should use the unblock template on your talk page, and only use UTRS if you cannot edit your talk page.[1]
直接請求解除封鎖[编辑]
Appeals will usually take place on your user talk page; use the unblock template on your talk page to initiate this process:
- If there is agreement that you may have been blocked unfairly, you may be directly unblocked (if the block was clearly and obviously a mistake), but this is very rare unless there genuinely were no prospective grounds for the block. Usually the blocking admin's judgement is respected if there is any question of doubt.
- You may be unblocked if the blocking admin changes their mind or can't be reached, and an unblock is considered reasonable.
- When you are unblocked, you may then follow the dispute resolution process if you believe that you were treated unfairly.
- If an unblocking needs discussion, reaching a consensus usually takes several days.
- After a discussion takes place, if there is consensus to unblock, the user is unblocked right away, although conditions may be imposed by the unblocking admin.
- If there is no consensus to unblock, or if there is consensus to keep the user blocked after "due consideration by the community"[2], and the user is blocked indefinitely, the user is considered community banned indefinitely, and must go through the ban appeals process to have it reversed.
其他請求解除封鎖的方法[编辑]
In highly unusual cases, you may wish to utilize the dispute resolution process while you are still blocked. To do so, you may contact other Wikipedians by e-mail, or by editing your talk page (which you can usually do even if blocked).
Users may not appeal blocks to the Arbitration Committee by email, except if:
- The block is an Oversight block or CheckUser block
- The reasons for the block or information related to your appeal is unsuitable for public discussion
- You have been blocked or banned by the Arbitration Committee or by an Arbitration Enforcement decision.
濫用請求解除封鎖程序[编辑]
A usual block prevents users from editing all pages except their user talk page, in order to have a chance for appeal, and so that they are not shut out completely and are able to participate at least to some degree in Wikipedia, while the block is active.
Upon a request to seek arbitration, editing access may be restored to a limited number of other pages (such as those connected with their appeal) pending the formal decision, so that the matter (and any evidence, facts, mitigating circumstances, or corrections) can be presented as well.
A minority of editors who are blocked use these privileges poorly, for personal attacks or to play games and make a point. Inevitably the response to such actions is simple – editing access is blocked in its entirety and without further discussion, whereas if the user had been responsible and reasonable, an entirely different result might well have happened.
Wikipedia blocks are usually warnings only. Once they are over and learned from, they are in the past (unless repeated). Wikipedia and its administrators and arbitration committee have a real wish for everyone who is capable of acting responsibly to be able to enjoy editing.
Users who are blocked are asked to use this as a chance to reflect, an opportunity to show their understanding and ability to act responsibly, and a period of time to let the matter pass and be learned from.
Users who have lost the ability to request unblocking on their talk pages may then do so at UTRS. Unfortunately, they may continue to abuse the appeal process via that venue as well, and may be banned from UTRS, for six months if a Standard offer is still possible, or indefinitely in the most egregious instances.
第三方請求解除封鎖[编辑]
Third party appeals of blocks are allowed, but generally discouraged. However, some exceptions are permitted for block reviews. An administrator may choose to refer their own block for review, particularly if it might be controversial. Any editor may request community review of blocks they believe are out-of-policy, though they should attempt to discuss their concerns with the blocking admin first. Such reviews are not considered block appeals, and if the review results in the block being endorsed it is not converted into a community ban.[3]
See also[编辑]
Notes[编辑]
- ^ For transparency, unblock requests and discussions should happen in user talk pages unless private information is involved. If you cannot edit your talk page, an administrator may restore your talk page access and direct the appeal to user talk page if appropriate.
- ^ Wikipedia:Banning policy
- ^ Guidance based on discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 166 § RfC: Can editors request community review of the blocks of others?