| 案件名
|
引用
|
簡介
|
| 盧卡斯訴厄爾案
|
281 U.S. 111 (1930)
|
origin of Assignment of income doctrine, contract to divide income between husband and wife
|
| 美國訴斯普拉格案
|
282 U.S. 716 (1931)
|
第十憲法修正案
|
| 麥克博伊爾訴合眾國案
|
283 U.S. 25 (1931)
|
National Motor Vehicle Theft Act held not to apply to aircraft
|
| 斯特龍伯格訴加利福尼亞州案
|
283 U.S. 359 (1931)
|
constitutionality of California red flag-banning statute, freedom of symbolic speech
|
| Burnet v. Logan
|
283 U.S. 404 (1931)
|
Cost basis must be recovered before taxpayer realizes any taxable income
|
| Near v. Minnesota
|
283 U.S. 697 (1931)
|
言論自由
|
| 美國訴柯比木材公司案
|
284 U.S. 1 (1931)
|
taxation of gain on reduction of debt
|
| 布萊克默訴合眾國案
|
284 U.S. 421 (1932)
|
International law and 5th Amendment allowed U.S. government to retain jurisdiction over its citizens abroad
|
| 布洛伯格訴合眾國案
|
284 U.S. 299 (1932)
|
雙重懲罰標準
|
| 克羅韋爾訴本森案
|
285 U.S. 22 (1932)
|
upholding adjudication of private rights by an administrative agency, not an Article III court
|
| New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann
|
285 U.S. 262 (1932)
|
substantive due process
|
| 尼克松訴康登案
|
286 U.S. 73 (1932)
|
White primaries in Texas violated Equal Protection Clause
|
| North American Oil Consolidated v. Burnet
|
286 U.S. 417 (1932)
|
claim of right doctrine in U.S. tax law
|
| 鮑威爾訴阿拉巴馬州案
|
287 U.S. 45 (1932)
|
access to counsel
|
| 索雷爾斯訴合眾國案
|
287 U.S. 435 (1932)
|
Entrapment recognized as a valid defense
|
| Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell
|
290 U.S. 398 (1934)
|
Minnesota's suspension of creditor's remedies did not violate the Contract Clause
|
| 巴勒斯訴合眾國案
|
290 U.S. 534 (1934)
|
upholding the constitutionality of the Federal Corrupt Practices Act
|
| Nebbia v. New York
|
291 U.S. 502 (1934)
|
Substantive Due Process, economic regulation
|
| Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan
|
293 U.S. 388 (1935)
|
delegation of authority, New Deal
|
| Gregory v. Helvering
|
293 U.S. 465 (1935)
|
稅法
|
| 謝克特家禽集團訴合眾國案
|
295 U.S. 495 (1935)
|
interstate commerce, New Deal
|
| 漢弗萊執行官訴合眾國案
|
295 U.S. 602 (1935)
|
administrative action, separation of powers
|
| Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. White
|
296 U.S. 176 (1935)
|
early case on standard of review for regulations
|
| Fox Film Corp. v. Muller
|
296 U.S. 207 (1935)
|
contract dispute, "adequate and independent state ground"
|
| 美國訴康斯坦丁
|
296 U.S. 287 (1935)
|
taxation of liquor
|
| 美國訴巴特勒
|
297 U.S. 1 (1936)
|
徵稅權
|
| Grosjean v. American Press Co.
|
297 U.S. 233 (1936)
|
Freedom of the press, taxation of newspapers
|
| 布朗訴密西西比州案
|
297 U.S. 278 (1936)
|
coerced confessions by means of violence
|
| 華萊士訴卡滕案
|
298 U.S. 229 (1936)
|
application of the Grain Futures Act
|
| 瓦朗蒂娜訴合眾國案
|
299 U.S. 5 (1936)
|
extradition powers of the executive branch
|
| Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co.
|
299 U.S. 65 (1936)
|
U.S. government as an indispensable party
|
| United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.
|
299 U.S. 304 (1936)
|
export restrictions, Presidential power over international commerce
|
| DeJonge v. Oregon
|
299 U.S. 353 (1937)
|
14th Amendment applied to freedom of assembly
|
| 西海岸旅館公司訴帕里什案
|
300 U.S. 379 (1937)
|
freedom of contract, minimum wage laws; 「the switch in time that saved nine」
|
| National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation
|
301 U.S. 1 (1937)
|
interstate commerce; another consequence of 「the switch in time that saved nine」
|
| Steward Machine Company v. Davis
|
301 U.S. 548 (1937)
|
Court upholds the unemployment insurance provisions of the Social Security Act
|
| Bogardus v. Commissioner
|
302 U.S. 34 (1937)
|
distinction between taxable compensation and tax-exempt gifts under the Internal Revenue Code
|
| Palko v. Connecticut
|
302 U.S. 319 (1937)
|
selective incorporation, double jeopardy
|
| 康涅狄格通用人壽保險公司訴約翰遜案
|
303 U.S. 77 (1938)
|
|
| Lovell v. City of Griffin
|
303 U.S. 444 (1938)
|
City ordinance requiring official permission to distribute literature held unconstitutionally broad
|
| New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co.
|
303 U.S. 552 (1938)
|
safeguard right to boycott and chips away at discriminatory hiring practices against African Americans
|
| 黑爾訴肯塔基州案
|
303 U.S. 613 (1938)
|
exclusion of African Americans from juries
|
| Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins
|
304 U.S. 64 (1938)
|
limiting general federal common law by requiring that state law apply except where federal law exists
|
| Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch
|
304 U.S. 92 (1938)
|
reaffirming existence of federal common law in other cases
|
| United States v. Carolene Products Co.
|
304 U.S. 144 (1938)
|
interstate commerce, substantive due process, and (in footnote four) equal protection
|
| NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co.
|
304 U.S. 333 (1938)
|
Striking workers continue to be employees within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act, but use of strikebreakers is permissible
|
| Johnson v. Zerbst
|
304 U.S. 458 (1938)
|
第六憲法修正案
|
| Collins v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co.
|
304 U.S. 518 (1938)
|
Twenty-first Amendment and the enforcement of state liquor laws in U.S. national parks
|
| Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.
|
305 U.S. 111 (1938)
|
patent holder has no remedy in unfair competition law against competitor selling similar goods under a non-trademarked name after patent expires—prelude to functionality doctrine
|
| Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada
|
305 U.S. 337 (1938)
|
chipping away at separate but equal education
|
| 美國訴米勒案
|
307 U.S. 174 (1939)
|
第二憲法修正案
|
| 科爾曼訴米勒案
|
307 U.S. 433 (1939)
|
length of time proposed Constitutional amendments remain pending
|
| Hague v. CIO
|
307 U.S. 496 (1939)
|
工會和自由集會
|
| 施耐德訴新澤西州案
|
308 U.S. 147 (1939)
|
enforcement of littering ordinances and free speech
|
| 錢伯斯訴佛羅里達州案
|
309 U.S. 227 (1940)
|
coerced confessions in a murder case
|
| Helvering v. Bruun
|
309 U.S. 461 (1940)
|
A landlord realizes a taxable gain when he repossesses property improved by a tenant
|
| Thornhill v. Alabama
|
310 U.S. 88 (1940)
|
free speech clause of First Amendment includes peaceful labor picketing
|
| 坎特韋爾訴康涅狄格州案
|
310 U.S. 296 (1940)
|
incorporated Free Exercise Clause
|
| United States v. American Trucking Associations
|
310 U.S. 534 (1940)
|
Motor Carrier Act of 1935 did not empower the Interstate Commerce Commission to regulate all employees of common and contract motor carriers, but rather only those whose duties affect safety of operation
|
| Minersville School District v. Gobitis
|
310 U.S. 586 (1940)
|
saluting the flag
|
| Hansberry v. Lee
|
311 U.S. 32 (1940)
|
res judicata may not bind a subsequent plaintiff who had no opportunity to be represented in the earlier civil action
|
| Helvering v. Horst
|
311 U.S. 112 (1940)
|
refinement of assignment of income doctrine
|
| Sibbach v. Wilson
|
312 U.S. 1 (1941)
|
Erie doctrine, applicability of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
|
| Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co.
|
312 U.S. 496 (1941)
|
Abstention doctrine
|
| Cox v. New Hampshire
|
312 U.S. 569 (1941)
|
petitions on public property
|
| United States v. Darby Lumber Co.
|
312 U.S. 100 (1941)
|
power of the United States Congress to regulate employment conditions; Commerce Clause
|
| United States v. Classic
|
313 U.S. 299 (1941)
|
power of the federal government to regulate primary elections
|
