卡本特诉合众国案
| 卡本特诉合众国案 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | ||||||||
| 辩论：2017年11月29日 判决：2018年6月22日 | ||||||||
| 案件全名 | Timothy Ivory Carpenter v. United States of America | |||||||
| 诉讼记录号 | 16-402 | |||||||
| 引注案号 | 585 U.S. ___ 138 S. Ct. 2206; 201 L. Ed. 2d 507 | |||||||
| 既往案件 | A jury in the District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan convicted Timothy Carpenter of armed robbery. The conviction was affirmed by Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States v. Carpenter, 819 F.3d 880 (6th Cir. 2016); cert. granted, 137 S. Ct. 2211 (2017). | |||||||
| 辩论 | 口头辩论 | |||||||
| 法庭判决 | ||||||||
| Government acquisition of cell-site records is a Fourth Amendment search, and, thus, generally requires a warrant. | ||||||||
| 最高法院法官 | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| 法庭意见 | ||||||||
| 多数意见 | 罗伯茨 联名：金斯伯格、布雷耶、索托马约尔、卡根 | |||||||
| 不同意见 | 肯尼迪 联名：托马斯、阿利托 | |||||||
| 不同意见 | 托马斯 | |||||||
| 不同意见 | 阿利托 联名：托马斯 | |||||||
| 不同意见 | 戈萨奇 | |||||||
卡本特诉合众国案（英语：Carpenter v. United States[1]），是美国最高法院的一个里程碑式的判例，涉及手机位置资讯（CSLI）的隐私问题。[2]美国首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨提出的5–4判决之裁定，致法院认为美国政府违反了美国宪法第四修正案，即因政府搜查了手机位置资讯的历史记录，其中也包含没有搜查令的手机之实际位置资讯。
注释[编辑]
- ^ No. 16-402, 585 U.S. ____ (2018) (PDF). [2020-11-09]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2018-06-22）.
- ^ Ng, Alfred. Supreme Court says warrant necessary for phone location data in win for Privacy. cnet.com. June 22, 2018 [June 22, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2018-06-22）.
延伸阅读[编辑]
- Trevor Burrus & James Knight, Katz Nipped and Katz Cradled: Carpenter and the Evolving Fourth Amendment, 2017-2018 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 79 (2018)
- Caminker, Evan. Location Tracking and Digital Data: Can Carpenter Build a Stable Privacy Doctrine?. Supreme Court Review. 1 May 2019, 2018: 411–481 [2020-11-09]. ISSN 0081-9557. doi:10.1086/702164. （原始内容存档于2020-11-22）.
- Donohue, Laura K. Functional Equivalence and Residual Rights Post-Carpenter: Framing a Test Consistent with Precedent and Original Meaning. Supreme Court Review. 1 May 2019, 2018: 347–410. ISSN 0081-9557. doi:10.1086/704133.
- Susan Freiwald & Stephen Wm. Smith, The Supreme Court, 2017 Term — Comment: The Carpenter Chronicle: A Near-Perfect Surveillance, 132 Harv. L. Rev. 205 (2018)
- Chaker, Vania. Your Spying Smartphone: Individual Privacy Is Narrowly Strengthened in Carpenter v. United States, The U.S. Supreme Court's Most Recent Fourth Amendment Ruling. Journal of Tech Law. 21 September 2018 [21 September 2018]. （原始内容存档于2021-01-27）.
- Chaker, Vania. Chimaera I: Chimaera Unleashed: The Specter of Warrantless Governmental Intrusion Is a Phantom that Has Achieved Greater Life in the Ether of Internet Communications. Journal of Tech Law. 6 August 201, 23 [6 August 2019]. （原始内容存档于2020-07-19）.
参见[编辑]
判例[编辑]
- 莱利诉加利福尼亚州案(573 U.S. __ (2014))
- 凯洛诉美国案(533 U.S. 27 (2001))
- 美国诉卡罗案(468 U.S. 705 (1984))
主题[编辑]
- 手机追踪(手机位置循迹)
其它[编辑]
外部链接[编辑]
- Carpenter v. United States, No. 16-402, 585 U.S. ____ (2018)的文本可参见：Justia · Supreme Court (slip opinion)
- Case page （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） at SCOTUSblog