基督神話論

基督神話論，或耶穌神話論是認為有關耶穌的故事沒有歷史事實為依據的神話作品，^[1]或者按巴特·葉爾曼的說法指的是認為歷史上耶穌不存在的觀點，又或者是即使耶穌曾經存在，也與建立基督教無關。^{[q 1]}不過，主流學術觀點生活在公元1世紀猶大地區的耶穌在歷史上確有其人，而且他很可能接受過施洗並被釘在了十字架上。^[2]除此之外，史學界並沒有關於福音書中其他故事在歷史上是否真實發生的共識。

參考資料[編輯]

Bromiley, Geoffrey W. (編). Jesus Christ. International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (ISBE): fully revised, illustrated, in four volumes. Vol. 2, E–J. Associate editors: Everett F. Harrison, Roland K. Harrison, William Sanford LaSor. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. 1982: 1034–1049 [2023-11-30]. ISBN 978-0-8028-3785-1. OCLC 500471471. （原始內容存檔於2023-10-09）.
Bart Ehrman (2012), Did Jesus Exist?, p.20: "It is fair to say that mythicists as a group, and as individuals, are not taken seriously by the vast majority of scholars in the fields of New Testament, early Christianity, ancient history, and theology. This is widely recognized, to their chagrin, by mythicists themselves."

^ （Ehrman 2012，pp.12, 347, n. 1）: "[Per] Jesus mythicism, Earl Doherty, defines the view as follows: it is "the theory that no historical Jesus worthy of the name existed, that Christianity began with a belief in a spiritual, mythical figure, that the Gospels are essentially allegory and fiction, and that no single identifiable person lay at the root of the Galilean preaching tradition." [Earl Doherty (2009), Jesus: Neither God nor Man: The Case for a mythical Jesus (Ottawa, ON: Age of Reason Publications), vii–viii.] In simpler terms, the historical Jesus did not exist. Or if he did, he had virtually nothing to do with the founding of Christianity."

^ Bromiley 1982，第1034頁. "... the story of Jesus is a piece of mythology [possessing no] substantial claims to historical fact".
^ "He certainly existed, as virtually every competent scholar of antiquity, Christian or non-Christian, agrees, based on certain and clear evidence." B. Ehrman, 2011 Forged : writing in the name of God ISBN 978-0-06-207863-6. p. 256-257

[Ehrman_def-2] （Ehrman 2012，pp.12, 347, n. 1）: "[Per] Jesus mythicism, Earl Doherty, defines the view as follows: it is "the theory that no historical Jesus worthy of the name existed, that Christianity began with a belief in a spiritual, mythical figure, that the Gospels are essentially allegory and fiction, and that no single identifiable person lay at the root of the Galilean preaching tradition." [Earl Doherty (2009), Jesus: Neither God nor Man: The Case for a mythical Jesus (Ottawa, ON: Age of Reason Publications), vii–viii.] In simpler terms, the historical Jesus did not exist. Or if he did, he had virtually nothing to do with the founding of Christianity."

[1] Bromiley 1982，第1034頁. "... the story of Jesus is a piece of mythology [possessing no] substantial claims to historical fact".

[Ehrman256-3] "He certainly existed, as virtually every competent scholar of antiquity, Christian or non-Christian, agrees, based on certain and clear evidence." B. Ehrman, 2011 Forged : writing in the name of God ISBN 978-0-06-207863-6. p. 256-257

[1]

[q 1]

[2]