跳至內容

納粹劫掠

維基百科，自由的百科全書
1944年，在羅馬威尼斯宮一德國士兵拿着一幅取自拿坡里國立考古博物館由喬瓦尼·保羅·帕尼尼（英語：Giovanni Paolo Panini）繪的《波旁王朝的查理三世在羅馬的奎里納萊咖啡館拜訪教皇本篤十四世》（Carlo III di Borbone che visita il papa Benedetto XIV nella coffee-house del Quirinale a Roma）畫作。

納粹劫掠藝術品（德語：Raubkunst），是納粹德國盜竊藝術品及其他物品的有組織搶劫行為。特別是掠奪波蘭和猶太人的財產。掠奪從1933年開始，從沒收德國猶太人的財產開始，直到二戰結束。除了金銀外，還掠奪各重要文化物品，包括繪畫、陶瓷、書籍、宗教珍品，特別是被稱為「藝術保護（英語：Kunstschutz）」的軍事單位「盜取」最多。

已隱藏部分未翻譯內容，歡迎參與翻譯。

背景

[編輯]

Adolf Hitler was an unsuccessful artist who was denied admission to the Vienna Academy of Fine Arts. Nonetheless, he thought of himself as a connoisseur of the arts, and, in Mein Kampf, he ferociously attacked modern art as degenerate, including Cubism, Futurism, and Dadaism, all of which he considered the product of a decadent 20th-century society. In 1933 when Hitler became Chancellor of Germany, he enforced his aesthetic ideal on the nation. The types of art that were favored among the Nazi party were classical portraits and landscapes by Old Masters, particularly those of Germanic origin. Modern art that did not match this was dubbed degenerate art by the Third Reich and all that was found in Germany's state museums was to be sold or destroyed.[1] With the sums raised, the Führer's objective was to establish the European Art Museum in Linz. Other Nazi dignitaries, like Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring and Foreign Affairs minister von Ribbentrop, were also intent on taking advantage of German military conquests to increase their private art collections.[1]

掠奪猶太人

[編輯]

The systematic dispossession of Jewish people and the transfer of their homes, businesses, artworks, financial assets, musical instruments,[2] books, and even home furnishings to the Reich was an integral component of the Holocaust.[3][4] In every country controlled by Nazis, Jews were stripped of their assets through a wide array of mechanisms[5][6][7] and Nazi looting organizations.[8][9][10][11]

出售從德國博物館沒收的藝術品

[編輯]

Art dealers Hildebrand Gurlitt, Karl Buchholz, Ferdinand Moeller, and Bernhard Boehmer set up shop in Schloss Niederschonhausen, just outside Berlin, to sell a cache of near-16,000 paintings and sculptures which Hitler and Göring removed from the walls of German museums in 1937–1938. They were first put on display in the Haus der Kunst in Munich on 19 July 1937, with the Nazi leaders inviting public mockery by two million visitors who came to view the condemned modern art in the Degenerate Art Exhibition. Propagandist Joseph Goebbels in a radio broadcast called Germany's degenerate artists "garbage". Hitler opened the Haus der Kunst exhibition with a speech. In it, he described German art as suffering "a great and fatal illness".

公開焚燒藝術品

[編輯]

Hildebrand Gurlitt and his colleagues did not have much success with their sales, mainly because art labeled "rubbish" had small appeal. So, on 20 March 1939, they set fire to 1,004 paintings and sculptures and 3,825 watercolors, drawings, and prints in the courtyard of the Berlin Fire Department, an act of infamy similar to their earlier well-known book burnings. The propaganda act raised the attention they hoped. The Basel Museum in Switzerland arrived with 50,000 Swiss francs to spend. Shocked art lovers came to buy. What is unknown after these sales is the number of paintings kept by Gurlitt, Buchholz, Moeller, Boehmer, and later sold by them to Switzerland and America—ships crossed the Atlantic from Lisbon—for personal gain.[12]

瑞士的公開拍賣和私人拍賣

[編輯]

The most notorious auction of Nazi looted art was the "degenerate art" auction organized by Theodor Fischer on 30 June 1939 at the Grand Hotel National in Lucerne, Switzerland. The artworks on offer had been "de-accessioned" from German museums by the Nazis, yet many well known art dealers participated alongside proxies for major collectors and museums.[13] In addition to public auctions, there were many private sales by art dealers. The Commission for Art Recovery has characterized Switzerland as "a magnet" for assets from the rise of Hitler until the end of World War II.[14] Researching and documenting Switzerland's role "as an art-dealing centre and conduit for cultural assets in the Nazi period and in the immediate post-war period" was one of the missions of the Bergier Commission, under the directorship of Professor Georg Kreis.[15]

納粹盜竊組織

[編輯]
Seal of the "Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg", used from 1941 to 1944 to mark seized documents by the German occupation troops

While the Nazis were in power, they plundered cultural property from Germany and from every territory they occupied, targeting Jewish property in particular.[16] This was conducted in a systematic manner with organizations specifically created to determine which public and private collections were most valuable to the Nazi Regime. Some of the objects were earmarked for Hitler's never realized Führermuseum, some objects went to other high-ranking officials such as Hermann Göring, while other objects were traded to fund Nazi activities.

In 1940, an organization known as the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg für die Besetzten Gebiete (Reichsleiter Rosenberg Institute for the Occupied Territories), or ERR, was formed, headed for Alfred Rosenberg by Gerhard Utikal​（德語）. The first operating unit, the western branch for France, Belgium, and the Netherlands, called the Dienststelle Westen (Western Agency), was located in Paris. The chief of this Dienststelle was Kurt von Behr. Its original purpose was to collect Jewish and Freemasonic books and documents, either for destruction or for removal to Germany for further "study". However, late in 1940, Hermann Göring, who in fact controlled the ERR, issued an order that effectively changed the mission of the ERR, mandating it to seize "Jewish" art collections and other objects. The war loot had to be collected in a central place in Paris, the Museum Jeu de Paume. At this collection point worked art historians and other personnel who inventoried the loot before sending it to Germany. Göring also commanded that the loot would first be divided between Hitler and himself. Hitler later ordered that all confiscated works of art were to be made directly available to him. From the end of 1940 to the end of 1942, Göring traveled 20 times to Paris. In the Museum Jeu de Paume, art dealer Bruno Lohse staged 20 expositions of the newly looted art objects, especially for Göring, from which Göring selected at least 594 pieces for his own collection.[17] Göring made Lohse his liaison-officer and installed him in the ERR in March 1941 as the deputy leader of this unit. Items which Hitler and Göring did not want were made available to other Nazi leaders. Under Rosenberg and Göring's leadership, the ERR seized 21,903 art objects from German-occupied countries.[18]

Other Nazi looting organizations included the Sonderauftrag Linz​（德語）, the organization run by the art historian Hans Posse, which was particularly in charge of assembling the works for the Führermuseum, the Dienststelle Mühlmann, operated by Kajetan Mühlmann which operated primarily in the Netherlands and in Belgium, and a Sonderkommando Kuensberg connected to the minister of foreign affairs Joachim von Ribbentrop, which operated first in France, then in Russia and North Africa. In Western Europe, with the advancing German troops, were elements of the "von Ribbentrop Battalion", named after Joachim von Ribbentrop. These men were responsible for entering private and institutional libraries in the occupied countries and removing any materials of interest to the Germans, especially items of scientific, technical, or other informational value.[19]

Art collections from prominent Jewish families, including the Rothschilds, the Rosenbergs, the Wildensteins,[20] and the Schloss Family, were the targets of confiscations because of their significant value. Also, Jewish art dealers sold art to German organizations—often under duress, e.g., the art dealerships of Jacques Goudstikker, Benjamin and Nathan Katz,[21] and Kurt Walter Bachstitz. Also, non-Jewish art dealers sold art to the Germans, e.g., the art dealers De Boer[22] and Hoogendijk[22] in the Netherlands.

By the end of the war, the Third Reich amassed hundreds of thousands of cultural objects.

藝術品盜竊調查組

[編輯]

On 21 November 1944, at the request of Owen Roberts, William J. Donovan created the Art Looting Investigation Unit​（德語） (ALIU) within the OSS to collect information on the looting, confiscation, and transfer of cultural objects by Nazi Germany, its allies and the various individuals and organizations involved; to prosecute war criminals and to restitute property.[23][24] The ALIU compiled information on individuals believed to have participated in art looting, identifying a group of key suspects for capture and interrogation about their roles in carrying out Nazi policy. Interrogations were conducted in Bad Aussee, Austria.

ALIU報告

[編輯]

The ALIU Reports detail the networks of Nazi officials, art dealers, and individuals involved in the Hitler's policy of spoliation of Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe.[25] The ALIU's final report included 175 pages divided into three parts: Detailed Interrogation Reports (DIRs), which focused individuals who played pivotal roles in German spoliation; Consolidated Interrogations Reports (CIRs); and a "Red Flag list" of people involved in Nazi spoliation.[23] The ALIU Reports form one of the key records in the US Government Archives of Nazi Era Assets[26]

詳細情報報告

[編輯]

The first group of reports detailing the networks and relations between art dealers and other agents employed by Hitler, Göring, and Rosenberg are organized by name: Heinrich Hoffmann, Ernst Buchner, Gustav Rochlitz, Gunter Schiedlausky, Bruno Lohse, Gisela Limberger, Walter Andreas Hofer, Karl Kress, Walter Bornheim, Hermann Voss, and Karl Haberstock.[24][27]

綜合審訊報告

[編輯]

A second set of reports detail the art looting activities of Göring (The Goering Collection), the art looting activities of the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg (ERR), and Hitler's Linz Museum.

ALIU紅旗名稱列表

[編輯]

The Art Looting Intelligence Unit published a list of "Red Flag Names", organizing them by country: Germany, France, Switzerland, The Netherlands, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Sweden, and Luxembourg. Each name is followed by a description of the person's activities, their relations with other people in the spoliation network and, in many cases, information concerning their arrest or imprisonment by Allied forces.[24][28]

 蘇聯

[編輯]

To investigate and estimate Nazi plunder in the USSR during 1941 through 1945, the Soviet State Extraordinary Commission for Ascertaining and Investigating the Crimes Committed by the German-Fascist Invaders and Their Accomplices was formed on 2 November 1942. During the Great Patriotic War and afterward, until 1991, the Commission collected materials on Nazi crimes in the USSR, including incidents of plunder. Immediately following the war, the Commission outlined damage in detail to 64 of the most valuable Soviet museums, out of 427 damaged ones. In the Russian SFSR, 173 museums were found to have been plundered by the Nazis, with looted items numbering in the hundreds of thousands.

After the dissolution of the USSR, the Government of the Russian Federation formed the State Commission for the Restitution of Cultural Valuables to replace the Soviet Commission. Experts from this Russian institution originally consulted the work of the Soviet Commission, yet continue to catalog artworks lost during the war museum by museum. 截至2008年 (2008-Missing required parameter 1=month!), lost artworks of 14 museums and the libraries of Voronezh Oblast, Kursk Oblast, Pskov Oblast, Rostov Oblast, Smolensk Oblast, Northern Caucasus, Gatchina, Peterhof Palace, Tsarskoye Selo (Pushkin), Novgorod, and Novgorod Oblast, as well as the bodies of the Russian State Archives and CPSU Archives, were cataloged in 15 volumes, all of which were made available online. They contain detailed information on 1,148,908 items of lost artworks. The total number of lost items is unknown so far, because cataloging work for other damaged Russian museums is ongoing.[29]

Alfred Rosenberg commanded the so-called ERR, which was responsible for collecting art, books, and cultural objects from invaded countries, and also transferred their captured library collections back to Berlin during the retreat from Russia. "In their search for 'research materials' ERR teams and the Wehrmacht visited 375 archival institutions, 402 museums, 531 institutes, and 957 libraries in Eastern Europe alone".[30] The ERR also operated in the early days of the blitzkrieg of the Low Countries. This caused some confusion about authority, priority, and the chain of command among the German Army, the von Rippentropp Battalion and the Gestapo, and as a result of personal looting among the Army officers and troops. These ERR teams were, however, very effective. One account estimates that from the Soviet Union alone: "one hundred thousand geographical maps were taken on ideological grounds, for academic research, as means for political, geographical and economic information on Soviet cities and regions, or as collector's items".[30]

 波蘭

[編輯]
主條目：World War II looting of Poland
Aleksander Gierymski's Jewess with Oranges discovered on 26 November 2010 in an art auction in Buxtehude, Germany

After the occupation of Poland by German forces in September 1939, the Nazi regime committed genocide against Polish Jews[31] and attempted to exterminate its upper classes as well as its culture.[32] Thousands of art objects were looted, as the Nazis systematically carried out a plan of looting prepared even before the start of hostilities. 25 museums and many other facilities were destroyed.[33] The total cost of German Nazi theft and destruction of Polish art is estimated at 20 billion dollars, or an estimated 43 percent of Polish cultural heritage; over 516,000 individual art pieces were looted, including 2,800 paintings by European painters; 11,000 paintings by Polish painters; 1,400 sculptures; 75,000 manuscripts; 25,000 maps; 90,000 books, including over 20,000 printed before 1800; and hundreds of thousands of other items of artistic and historical value. Germany still has much Polish material looted during World War II. For decades, there have been negotiations between Poland and Germany concerning the return of the looted Polish property.[34]

 奧地利

[編輯]
主條目：Nazi storage sites for art during World War II

The Anschluss (joining) of Austria and Germany began on 12 March 1938. Looting of Jewish properties began immediately.[35] [36][37] Churches, monasteries, and museums were home to many pieces of art before the Nazis came but after, the majority of the artwork was taken. Ringstrasse, which was a residence for many people but as well as a community center, was confiscated and all of the art inside as well.[38] Between the years 1943 and 1945, salt mines in Altaussee held the majority of Nazi looted art. Some from Austria and others from all around Europe. In 1944, around 4,700 pieces of art were then stored in the salt mines.

Führermuseum

[編輯]
主條目：Führermuseum

After Hitler became Chancellor, he made plans to transform his home city of Linz, Austria, into the Third Reich's capital city for the arts. Hitler hired architects to work from his own designs to build several galleries and museums, which would collectively be known as the Führermuseum. Hitler wanted to fill his museum with the greatest art treasures in the world and believed that most of the world's finest art belonged to Germany after having been looted during the Napoleonic and First World wars.

Hermann Göring collection

[編輯]

The Hermann Göring collection, a personal collection of Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring, was another large collection including confiscated property, consisted of approximately 50 percent of works of art confiscated from the enemies of the Reich.[39] Assembled in large measure by art dealer Bruno Lohse, Göring's adviser, and ERR representative in Paris, in 1945, the collection included over 2,000 individual pieces including more than 300 paintings. The US National Archives and Records Administration's Consolidated Interrogation Report No. 2 states that Göring never crudely looted, instead he always managed "to find a way of giving at least the appearance of honesty, by a token payment or promise thereof to the confiscation authorities. Although he and his agents never had an official connection with the German confiscation organizations, they nevertheless used them to the fullest extent possible."[39]

納粹儲存的掠奪物品

[編輯]
German loot stored at Schlosskirche Ellingen, Bavaria (April 1945)
Pieter Bruegel the Elder painting Altaussee, Austria (April 1945)
Altaussee, May 1945 after the removal of the eight 500-公斤（1,100-英磅） bombs at the Nazi stolen art repository.
The Ghent Altarpiece during recovery from the Altaussee salt mine at the end of World War II.
The Madonna of Bruges during recovery from the Altaussee salt mine, 1945
Dwight D. Eisenhower (right) inspects stolen artwork in a salt mine in Merkers, accompanied by Omar Bradley (left) and George S. Patton (center)
Nazi gold in Merkers Salt Mine
As Minister of Economics, Walther Funk accelerated the pace of re-armament and as Reichsbank president banked for the SS the gold rings of Nazi concentration camp victims
Eyeglasses of victims from Auschwitz

The Third Reich amassed hundreds of thousands of objects from occupied nations and stored them in several key locations, such as Musée Jeu de Paume in Paris and the Nazi headquarters in Munich. As the Allied forces gained advantage in the war and bombed Germany's cities and historic institutions, Germany "began storing the artworks in salt mines and caves for protection from Allied bombing raids. These mines and caves offered the appropriate humidity and temperature conditions for artworks."[40] Well known repositories of this kind were mines in Merkers, Altaussee, and Siegen. These mines were not only used for the storage of looted art but also of art that had been in Germany and Austria before the beginning of the Nazi rule.[41] Degenerate art was legally banned by the Nazis from entering Germany, and so ones designated were held in what was called the Martyr's Room at the Jeu de Paume. Much of Paul Rosenberg's professional dealership and personal collection were so subsequently designated by the Nazis. Following Joseph Goebbels's earlier private decree to sell these degenerate works for foreign currency to fund the building of the Führermuseum and the wider war effort, Hermann Göring personally appointed a series of ERR approved dealers to liquidate these assets and then pass the funds to swell his personal art collection, including Hildebrand Gurlitt. With the looted degenerate art sold onward via Switzerland, Rosenberg's collection was scattered across Europe. Today, some 70 of his paintings are missing, including: the large Picasso watercolor Naked Woman on the Beach, painted in Provence in 1923; seven works by Matisse; and the Portrait of Gabrielle Diot by Degas.[1]

掠奪猶太書籍

[編輯]

One of the things Nazis sought after during their invasion of European countries was Jewish books and writings. Their goal was to collect all of Europe's Jewish books and burn them. One of the first countries to be raided was France, where the Nazis took 50,000 books from the Alliance Israélite Universelle; 10,000 from L'Ecole Rabbinique, one of Paris's most significant rabbinic seminaries; and 4,000 volumes from the Federation of Jewish Societies of France, an umbrella group. From there, they went on to take a total of 20,000 books from the Lipschuetz Bookstore and another 28,000 from the Rothschild family's personal collection, before scouring the private homes of Paris and coming up with thousands of more books. After sweeping France for every Jewish book they could find, the Nazis moved on to the Netherlands where they would take millions more. They raided the house of Hans Furstenberg, a wealthy Jewish banker and stole his 16,000 volume collection; in Amsterdam, they took 25,000 volumes from the Bibliotheek van het Portugeesch Israelietisch Seminarium; 4,000 from Ashkenazic Beth ha- Midrasch Ets Haim; and 100,000 from Bibliotheca Rosenthaliana. In Italy, the central synagogue of Rome contained two libraries, one was owned by the Italian Rabbinic College and the other one was the Jewish community Library. In 1943, the Nazis came through Italy, packaged up every book from the synagogue, and sent them back to Germany.[42]

即時後果

[編輯]
更多資訊：United States restitution to the Soviet Union

The Allies created special commissions, such as the MFAA organization to help protect famous European monuments from destruction and, after the war, to travel to formerly Nazi-occupied territories to find Nazi art repositories. In 1944 and 1945, one of the greatest challenges for the "Monuments Men" was to keep Allied forces from plundering and "taking artworks and sending them home to friends and family"; When "off-limits" warning signs failed to protect the artworks the "Monuments Men" started to mark the storage places with white tape, which was used by Allied troops as a warning sign for unexploded mines.[40] They recovered thousands of objects, many of which had been pillaged by the Nazis.

The Allies found these artworks in over 1,050 repositories in Germany and Austria at the end of World War II. In summer 1945, Capt. Walter Farmer became the collecting point's first director. The first shipment of artworks arriving at Wiesbaden Collection Point included cases of antiquities, Egyptian art, Islamic artifacts, and paintings from the Kaiser Friedrich Museum. The collecting point also received materials from the Reichsbank and Nazi-looted, Polish, liturgical collections. At its height, Wiesbaden stored, identified, and restituted approximately 700,000 individual objects, including paintings and sculptures, mainly to keep them away from the Soviet Army and wartime reparations.[43]

The Allies collected the artworks and stored them in collecting points, in particular the Central Collection Point in Munich until they could be returned. The identifiable works of art, that had been acquired by the Germans during the Nazi rule, were returned to the countries from which they were taken. It was up to the governments of each nation if and under which circumstances they would return the objects to the original owners.[44]

When the Munich collection point was closed, the owners of many of the objects had not been found. Nations were also unable to find all the owners or to verify that they were dead. There are many organizations put in place to help return the stolen items taken from the Jewish people. For example: Project Heart, the World Jewish Restitution Organization, and the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany. Depending on the circumstances, these organizations may receive the art works in lieu of the heirs.

後期發展

[編輯]

Although most of the stolen artworks and antiques were documented, found, or recovered "by the victorious Allied armies [...] principally hidden away in salt mines, tunnels, and secluded castles",[45] many artworks have never been returned to their rightful owners. Art dealers, galleries, and museums worldwide have been compelled to research their collection's provenance in order to investigate claims that some of the work was acquired after it had been stolen from its original owners.[46] Already in 1985, years before American museums recognized the issue and before the international conference on Nazi-looted assets of Holocaust victims, European countries released inventory lists of works of art, coins, and medals "that were confiscated from Jews by the Nazis during World War II, and announced the details of a process for returning the works to their owners and rightful heirs."[47] In 1998, an Austrian advisory panel recommended the return of 6,292 objets d'art to their legal owners (most of whom are Jews), under the terms of a 1998 restitution law.[48]

Nazi concentration camp and death camp victims had to strip completely before their murder, and all their personal belongings were stolen. The very valuable items, such as gold coins, rings, spectacles, jewelry, and other precious metal items, were sent to the Reichsbank for conversion to bullion. The value was then credited to SS accounts.

Pieces of art looted by the Nazis can still be found in Russian/Soviet[49] and American institutions: the Metropolitan Museum of Art revealed a list of 393 paintings that have gaps in their provenance during the Nazi Era, the Art Institute of Chicago has posted a listing of more than 500 works "for which links in the chain of ownership for the years 1933–1945 are still unclear or not yet fully determined." The San Diego Museum of Art[50] and the Los Angeles County Museum of Art[51] provide lists on the internet to determine if art items within their collection were stolen by the Nazis.

Stuart Eizenstat, the Under Secretary of State and head of the US delegation sponsoring the 1998 international conference on Nazi-looted assets of Holocaust victims in Washington conference stated that "From now on, [...] the sale, purchase, exchange and display of art from this period will be addressed with greater sensitivity and a higher international standard of responsibility."[52] The conference was attended by more than 49 countries and 13 different private entities, and the goal was to come to a federal consensus on how to handle Nazi-Era Looted Art. The conference was built on the foundation of the Nazi Gold Conference held in London in 1997. The US Department of State hosted the conference with the US Holocaust Memorial Museum from 30 November to 3 December 1998.[53]

After the conference, the Association of Art Museum Directors developed guidelines which require museums to review the provenance or history of their collections, focussing especially on art looted by the Nazis.[54] The National Gallery of Art in Washington identified more than 400 European paintings with gaps in their provenance during the World War II era.[54] One particular piece of art, "Still Life with Fruit and Game" by the 16th-century Flemish painter Frans Snyders, was sold by Karl Haberstock, whom the World Jewish Congress describes as "one of the most notorious Nazi art dealers."[54] In 2000, the New York City's Museum of Modern Art still told the US Congress that they were "not aware of a single Nazi-tainted work of art in our collection, of the more than 100,000" they held.[54]

In 1979, two paintings, a Renoir, Tête de jeune fille, and a Pissarro, Rue de village, appeared on Interpol's "12 Most Wanted List", but, to date, no-one knows their whereabouts (ATA Newsletter, Nov. '79, vol. 1, no. 9, p. 1. '78, 326.1–2). The New Jersey owner has asked the International Foundation for Art Research (IFAR) to republish information about the theft, with the hope that someone will recognize the paintings. The owner wrote IFAR that, when his parents emigrated from Berlin in 1938, two of their paintings "mysteriously disappeared". All of their other possessions were shipped from Germany to the US via the Netherlands, and everything except the box containing these two paintings arrived intact. After World War II, the owner's father made a considerable effort to locate the paintings but was unsuccessful. Over the years, numerous efforts have been made to recover them, articles have been published, and an advertisement appeared in the German magazine, Die Weltkunst, 15 May 1959. A considerable reward has been offered, subject to usual conditions, but there has been no response.

However, restitution efforts initiated by German politicians have not been free of controversy, either. As the German law for restitution applies to "cultural assets lost as a result of Nazi persecution, "which includes paintings that Jews who emigrated from Germany sold to support themselves,[55] pretty much any trade involving Jews in that era is affected, and the benefit of the doubt is given to claimants. German leftist politicians Klaus Wowereit (SPD, mayor of Berlin) and Thomas Flierl (Linkspartei) were sued in 2006 for being overly willing to give away the 1913 painting Berliner Straßenszene of expressionist Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, which was in Berlin's Brücke Museum. On display in Cologne in 1937, it had been sold for 3,000 Reichsmark by a Jewish family residing in Switzerland to a German collector. This sum is considered by experts to have been well over the market price.[56] The museum, which obtained the painting in 1980 after several ownership changes, could not prove that the family actually received the money. It was restituted[57] to the heiress of the former owners, and she had it auctioned off for $38.1 million.[58]

In 2010, as work began to extend an underground line from Alexanderplatz through the historic city centre to the Brandenburg Gate, a number of sculptures from the degenerate art exhibition were unearthed in the cellar of a private house close to the "Rote Rathaus". These included, for example, the bronze cubist style statue of a female dancer by the artist Marg Moll, and are now on display at the Neues Museum.[59][60][61]

From 2013 up to 2015, a committee researched the collection of the Dutch Royal family. The committee focussed on all objects acquired by the family since 1933 and which were made prior to 1945. In total, 1,300 artworks were studied. Dutch musea had already researched their collection in order to find objects stolen by the Nazis. It appeared that one painting of the forest near Huis ten Bosch by the Dutch painter Joris van der Haagen came from a Jewish collector. He was forced to hand the painting over to the former Jewish bank Lippmann, Rosenthal & Co. in Amsterdam,[62] which collected money and other possessions of the Jews in Amsterdam. The painting was bought by Queen Juliana in 1960. The family plans to return the painting to the heirs of the owner in 1942, a Jewish collector.[63]

到今天的影響

[編輯]

Approximately 20 percent of the art in Europe was looted by the Nazis, and there are well over 100,000 items that have not been returned to their rightful owners.[64] The majority of what is still missing includes everyday objects such as china, crystal, or silver. The extent to which looted art was taken was seen according to Spiegler as, "The Nazi art confiscation program has been called the greatest displacement of art in human history."[65]（p. 298） the end of World War II, "The United States Government has estimated that German forces and other Nazi agents before and during World War II had seized or coerced the sale of one fifth of all Western art then in existence, approximately a quarter of a million pieces of art."[65]（p. 298） Because of such wide displacement of Nazi looted art from all over Europe, "to this day, some tens of thousands of artworks stolen by the Nazi's have still not been located."[65]（p. 299）

Some objects of great cultural significance remain missing, though how much has yet to be determined. This is a major issue for the art market, since legitimate organizations do not want to deal in objects with unclear ownership titles. Since the mid-1990s, after several books, magazines, and newspapers began exposing the subject to the general public, many dealers, auction houses, and museums have grown more careful about checking the provenance of objects that are available for purchase in case they are looted. Some museums in the US and elsewhere have agreed to check the provenance of works in their collections.[66]

In addition to the role of courts in determining restitution or compensation, some states have created official bodies for the consideration and resolution of claims. In the UK, the Spoliation Advisory Panel advises the Department for Culture, Media and Sport on such claims.[67] IFAR, a not-for-profit educational and research organization, maintains a database of looted art.[68]

In 2013, the Canadian government created the Holocaust-era Provenance Research and Best-Practice Guidelines Project, through which they are investigating the holdings of six art galleries in Canada.[69]

1992年國際婦女運動檔案館發現

[編輯]
主條目：International Archives for the Women's Movement

On 14 January 1992, historian Marc Jansen reported in an article in NRC Handelsblad that archival collections stolen from the Netherlands including the records of the International Archives for the Women's Movement (荷蘭語：Internationaal Archief voor de Vrouwenbeweging (IAV)), which had been looted in 1940, had been found in Russia.[70] The confiscated records were initially sent to Berlin and later was moved to Sudetenland for security reasons. At the end of the war, the Red Army took the documents from German-occupied Czechoslovakia and, in 1945–1946, stored them in the KGB's Osobyi Archive​（德語） (俄語：Особый архив), meaning special archive, which was housed in Moscow. Though agreements were drafted almost immediately after the discovery, bureaucratic delays kept the archives from being returned for 11 years. In 2003, the partial recovery of the papers of some of the most noted feminists in the prewar period, including Aletta Jacobs and Rosa Manus, some 4,650 books and periodicals, records of the International Council of Women and International Woman Suffrage Alliance, among many photographs were returned. Approximately half of the original collection is still unrecovered.[71][72]

2012年慕尼黑藝術品發現

[編輯]
主條目：Gurlitt Collection

In early 2012, over 1,000 pieces of artwork were discovered at the home of Cornelius Gurlitt, the son of Hildebrand Gurlitt, of which about 200–300 pieces are suspected of being looted art, some of which may have been exhibited in the degenerate art exhibition held by the Nazis before World War II in several large German cities.[73] The collection contains works by Marc Chagall, Otto Dix, and Henri Matisse, Renoir, and Max Liebermann among many others.[73]

2014年紐倫堡藝術品發現

[編輯]

In January 2014, researcher Dominik Radlmaier of the city of Nuremberg announced that eight objects had been identified as lost art with a further 11 being under strong suspicion. The city's research project was started in 2004 and Radlmaier has been investigating full-time since then.[74][75]

2015年波蘭瓦烏布日赫傳聞裝甲列車

[編輯]
主條目：Nazi gold train

In Wałbrzych, Poland two amateur explorers—Piotr Koper and Andreas Richter—claim to have found a rumored armored train that is believed to be filled with gold, gems, and weapons. The train was rumored to be sealed in a tunnel in the closing days of World War II before the collapse of the Third Reich. Only 10 percent of the tunnel has been explored because much of the tunnel has collapsed. Finding the train will be an expensive and complicated operation involving a lot of funding, digging, and drilling. However, to support their claims the explorers said experts have examined the site with ground-penetrating, thermal, and magnetic sensors that picked up signs of a railway tunnel with metal tracks. The legitimacy of these claims has yet to be determined, yet the explorers are requesting 10 percent of the value of whatever is within the train if their findings are correct. Poland's deputy culture minister, Piotr Zuchowski, said he was "99 percent convinced" that the train had finally been found, but scientists claim that the explorers' findings are false.[76][77]

猶太數字文化恢復項目

[編輯]

The Jewish Digital Cultural Recovery Project (JDCRP) is a comprehensive database that focusses on the Jewish-owned art and cultural objects plundered by the Nazis and their allies from 1933 to 1945. The JDCRP was initiated in May 2016 by the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany in collaboration with the Commission for Art Recovery.[78] Their goal was to further expand on the already existent database of objects stolen by the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg, one of the primary Nazi agencies involved with the plunder of cultural artifacts in Nazi-occupied nations during World War II.[79]

By creating this database, the JDCRP is positioned to accomplish numerous goals. The collection of this data on looted Jewish objects during WWII can provide a deeper understanding of various looting agencies employed by the Nazi party, current whereabouts of individual artifacts, and details on persecuted Jewish artists. In addition, the information collected by the JDCRP can provide further guidance to families and heirs of art, museums, and the art market. Lastly, the JDCRP can serve as a way to memorialize Jewish artists that were victims of the Nazi party's looting and celebrate their artistic legacies.[80] Overall, the goal of the JDCRP is not to replace existing databases and publications regarding stolen art during the Third Reich but rather to supplement the already available information and build upon it with a focus on art plundered from Jews.[81] Furthermore, the mission of the JDCRP is not only to establish a central database for this information and make it easily accessible but also to develop a network of institutions that can work to promote additional research on this topic.[80]

The JDCRP accumulates data from a variety of sources. A few examples include inventories of looted objects found by Allied forces, lists of stolen objects submitted by victims, and lists of looted and restituted cultural objects compiled by governments. Once data is gathered on a specific object, the JDCRP strives to exhibit the following pieces of information: details regarding the stolen object, background on the perpetrators and victims of the theft, information on those who profited from the thefts, and specifics on the locations at which the stolen object(s) were held.[80]

On 1 January 2020, the JDCRP launched its Pilot Project centered around the famous art collection of Adolphe Schloss. The purpose of this initial launch is to test the feasibility of a central database for stolen Jewish artifacts and to determine the manner in which the JDCRP database will be constructed and maintained. This venture is funded by the European Union and is intended to establish the framework necessary for the JDCRP.[78]

其他被掠奪的藝術品

[編輯]

另見

[編輯]

參考

[編輯]
  1. ^ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Bonjour Paris – The Lost Museum. [23 December 2014]. （原始內容存檔於2011-11-03）. 
  2. ^ Lawford-Hinrichsen, Irene. Music publishing and patronage: C.F. Peters, 1800 to the Holocaust. .jewish-music.huji.ac.il. （原始內容存檔於2013-10-18）. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: Research: Bibliographies History of C. F. Peters, one of the oldest and largest music publishing houses in the world. Includes chapters covering the implications of Nazi racial and cultural policies on the German music publishing industry in general and the company itself, which was taken over, or "aryanized," by the Nazis after Kristallnacht. 
  3. ^ Nazification and Early Stages of Persecution: Identification, Expropriation; Aryanization; and Emigration | Kenyon College. digital.kenyon.edu. [2022-02-10]. （原始內容存檔於2022-02-10）. 
  4. ^ Turning History into Justice: Holocaust-Era Assets Records, Research, and Restitution. National Archives. 2016-08-15 [2022-02-10]. （原始內容存檔於2022-05-29） （英語）. 
  5. ^ HCPO: The Perpetrators and Their Methods - Aryanization. Department of Financial Services. [2022-02-10]. （原始內容存檔於2022-08-07） （英語）. 
  6. ^ Nazis Exacted $70,000,000 "flight Tax" in 4 Years. Jewish Telegraphic Agency. 1937-05-18 [2022-02-10]. （原始內容存檔於2022-04-07） （美國英語）. 
  7. ^ Nazi Restrictions, Special Taxes Strip Jews of Wealth. Jewish Telegraphic Agency. 1938-12-25 [2022-02-10]. （原始內容存檔於2022-04-07） （美國英語）. 
  8. ^ Feliciano, Hector, The Great Culture Robbery: the Plunder of Jewish-Owned Art, The Plunder of Jewish Property during the Holocaust (London: Palgrave Macmillan UK), 2001: 164–176 [2022-02-10], ISBN 978-1-349-41390-4, doi:10.1057/9780333985281_9, （原始內容存檔於2024-03-17） 
  9. ^ Gerard., Aalders. Nazi looting : the plunder of Dutch jewry during the second world war. Berg. 2004 [2022-07-26]. ISBN 978-1-85973-727-9. OCLC 901411527. （原始內容存檔於2024-03-17）. 
  10. ^ Britta., Bopf. "Arisierung" in Köln : die wirtschaftliche Existenzvernichtung der Juden 1933-1945. Emons. 2004 [2022-07-26]. ISBN 3-89705-311-X. OCLC 55062391. （原始內容存檔於2024-03-17）. 
  11. ^ Grimsted, Patricia Kennedy. RECONSTRUCTING THE RECORD OF NAZI CULTURAL PLUNDER (PDF). [2022-07-26]. （原始內容存檔 (PDF)於2022-02-21）. 
  12. ^ BBC News – The unfinished art business of World War Two. BBC News. 4 November 2013 [23 December 2014]. （原始內容存檔於2013-11-06）. 
  13. ^ Cohan, William. MoMA's Problematic Provenances. Artnews. November 17, 2011 [June 26, 2017]. （原始內容存檔於2012-05-01）. 
  14. ^ Commission for Art Recovery. Switzerland, Neutral Haven and a Willing Wartime Art Market. Commission for Art Recovery. [2022-07-26]. （原始內容存檔於2014-12-27）. 
  15. ^ Commission for Looted Art in Europe. Bergier Commission: Independent Commission of Experts Switzerland, Second World War (ICE)1996 – 2001. LootedArt.com. [June 26, 2017]. （原始內容存檔於2010-11-25）. 
  16. ^ Nazi Looting and Plunder. The Holocaust. [2020-12-12]. （原始內容存檔於2019-03-01） （英語）. 
  17. ^ Petropoulos, Jonathan. Art As Politics in the Third Reich, University of North Carolina Press, 1999, p. 190.
  18. ^ Walker, Andrew. Nazi War Trials有限度免費查閱，超限則需付費訂閱. United Kingdom: Pocket Essentials. 2006: 141. ISBN 1-903047-50-1. 
  19. ^ Hadden, R.L. The Heringen Collection of the US Geological Survey Library, Reston, Virginia. Earth Sciences History. 2008, 27 (2): 247. doi:10.17704/eshi.27.2.y1vq1168q51g1542. （原始內容存檔於19 October 2017）. 
  20. ^ DHM – Kunstsammlung Hermann Göring. [23 December 2014]. （原始內容存檔於2018-08-29）. 
  21. ^ Summary RC 1.90B. [23 December 2014]. （原始內容存檔於2014-04-08）. 
  22. ^ 22.0 22.1 DHM: Datenbank zum Central Collecting Point München. [23 December 2014]. （原始內容存檔於2014-04-08）. 
  23. ^ 23.0 23.1 DFS. The OSS and the Search for Looted Art. New York State Department of Financial Services. New York State DFS. [10 May 2017]. （原始內容存檔於2015-09-11）. 
  24. ^ 24.0 24.1 24.2 Michael Hussey, Michael J. Kurtz, and Greg Bradsher. Art Looting Intelligence Unit (ALIU) Reports 1945–1946 and ALIU Red Flag Names List and Index. LootedArt.com. USS Office of Strategic Services. [8 May 2017]. （原始內容存檔於2017-04-24）. 
  25. ^ Reports of the Office of Strategic Services Art Looting Investigation Unit. The Goering Collection: Consolidated Interrogation Report N° 2 15 – September 1945. www.govinfo.library.unt.edu. US Government. [20 May 2017]. （原始內容存檔於2015-10-09）. 
  26. ^ Key Series Descriptions. www.archives.gov. US Government Office of Strategic Services. 15 August 2016 [20 May 2017]. （原始內容存檔於2017-05-08）. 
  27. ^ DETAILED INTEBROGATION REPORT NO. 12 - Hermann Voss 15 September 1945 (PDF). [2022-07-26]. （原始內容存檔 (PDF)於2022-02-07）. 
  28. ^ Art Looting Intelligence Unit (ALIU) Reports 1945-1946 and ALIU Red Flag Names List and Index. www.lootedart.com. [2021-02-19]. （原始內容存檔於2019-12-08）. 
  29. ^ Summary Catalogue of the Lost Valuables of the Russian Federation. Cultural Values – The Victims of the War. Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation. [10 March 2021]. （原始內容存檔於2023-08-16）. 
  30. ^ 30.0 30.1 Hadden, R.L. 2008. "The Heringen Collection of the US Geological Survey Library, Reston, Virginia". Earth Sciences History. 27, no. 2: 248–249.
  31. ^ Murder of the Jews of Poland. www.yadvashem.org. [2022-07-01]. （原始內容存檔於2022-11-27） （英語）. 
  32. ^ Olsak-Glass, Judith. Review of Piotrowski's Poland's Holocaust. Sarmatian Review. January 1999 [2008-01-24]. （原始內容存檔於2008-03-05）. 
  33. ^ Rewindykacja dóbr kultury. [2007-08-21]. （原始內容存檔於August 21, 2007） （波蘭語）.  at Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  34. ^ （波蘭語） Rosjanie oddają skradzione dzieła sztuki （頁面存檔備份，存於互聯網檔案館）, Gazeta Wyborcza, 2007-10-14
  35. ^ Taylor, Karin. Nazi Loot Furnished Austrian Agencies. Washington Post. 2000-09-17 [2022-07-01]. ISSN 0190-8286. （原始內容存檔於2024-03-17） （美國英語）. 
  36. ^ Vienna's tourist trail of plunder. the Guardian. 2002-05-21 [2022-07-01]. （原始內容存檔於2019-02-24） （英語）. 
  37. ^ The Aryanization of Jewish Property in Austria during the Holocaust. Jewish/non-Jewish Relations. 2014-10-23 [2022-07-01]. （原始內容存檔於2022-09-03） （英語）. 
  38. ^ Donnell, Nicholas. A Tragic Fate. Law and Ethics Battle over Nazi-Looted Art. American Bar Association. 2017: 146–162. 
  39. ^ 39.0 39.1 Rothfeld, Anne. Nazi Looted Art. The Holocaust Records Preservation Project, Part 1, Fall 2002, Vol. 34, No. 3. The U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. 15 August 2016 [2022-07-26]. （原始內容存檔於2022-05-19）. 
  40. ^ 40.0 40.1 Rothfeld, Anne. Nazi Looted Art. The Holocaust Records Preservation Project, Part 2. Fall 2002, Vol. 34, No. 3. The U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. 15 August 2016 [2022-07-26]. （原始內容存檔於2021-03-07）. 
  41. ^ Siegen 2. April 1945: Kunstschätze unter amerikanischem Schutz (PDF). www.durchblick-siegen.de: 12. [17 April 2022]. （原始內容 (PDF)存檔於8 April 2018） （德語）. 
  42. ^ Glickman, Mark. Stolen Words: The Nazi Plunder of Jewish Books. The Jewish Publication Society. 2016: 124–135. 
  43. ^ H-Net Reviews. March 2005 [23 December 2014]. （原始內容存檔於2023-08-16）. 
  44. ^ Archived copy. [2014-04-07]. （原始內容存檔於2015-02-11）. 
  45. ^ Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Vol. 4. Twenty-Second Day. December 18, 1945, Morning Session. yale.edu. （原始內容存檔於April 19, 2009）. 
  46. ^ Jewish Heirs Want Their Art Back. Spiegel Online International. November 8, 2006 [2022-07-26]. （原始內容存檔於2024-03-17）. 
  47. ^ Douglas C McGill. Austria Sets Up System to Yield Nazi-Held Art. The New York Times. December 3, 1985
  48. ^ Austria prepares restitution of Nazi art loot. The Jerusalem Post. September 9, 1998. （原始內容存檔於November 3, 2012）. 
  49. ^ Honan, William H. Soviets Reported to Hide Looted Art. The New York Times. March 30, 1991, Section 1, Page 9, Column 4, 887 words
  50. ^ San Diego Museum of Art. （原始內容存檔於2010-03-09）. 
  51. ^ Los Angeles County Museum of Art. （原始內容存檔於2010-06-12）. 
  52. ^ Guidelines set for returning Nazi-looted art. Conference calls for 'just and fair solution'. CNN. December 3, 1998. （原始內容存檔於February 3, 2007）. 
  53. ^ The Washington Conference on Holocaust-Era Assets. fcit.usf.edu. [2015-12-14]. （原始內容存檔於2016-03-03）. 
  54. ^ 54.0 54.1 54.2 54.3 Manhattan museum plans to issue Holocaust looted-art study. CNN. March 2, 2000 [2022-07-26]. （原始內容存檔於2011-06-28）. 
  55. ^ SPIEGEL ONLINE, Hamburg, Germany. Surging Restitution Claims: Berlin Grapples With Legacy of Nazi-era Art Looting. SPIEGEL ONLINE. 20 November 2006 [23 December 2014]. （原始內容存檔於2012-03-26）. 
  56. ^ Trotz Strafanzeige: Kirchner-Gemälde wird versteigert. Der Spiegel. November 7, 2006 [2022-07-26]. （原始內容存檔於2024-03-17）. 
  57. ^ Entartete Kunst: Kirchner-Gemälde wieder in Privatbesitz. Der Spiegel. 27 July 2006 [2022-07-26]. （原始內容存檔於2024-03-17）. 
  58. ^ SPIEGEL, DER. Christie's Auction Raises Ghosts: Painting Confiscated by the Nazis Sold for $38.1 Million. Der Spiegel. 9 November 2006 [2022-07-26]. （原始內容存檔於2023-08-15）. 
  59. ^ Hickley, Catherine. 'Degenerate' Art Unearthed From Berlin Bomb Rubble. Bloomberg. 1946-09-27 [2010-11-10]. （原始內容存檔於2010-11-12）. 
  60. ^ Black, Rosemary. Rescued pre-WWII 'degenerate art' on display in the Neues Museum in Berlin. Nydailynews.com. November 9, 2010 [2010-11-10]. （原始內容存檔於2010-11-19）. 
  61. ^ Charles Hawley. Nazi Degenerate Art Rediscovered in Berlin. Der Spiegel. 2010-11-08 [2022-07-26]. （原始內容存檔於2012-03-25）. 
  62. ^ Koninklijk huis bezit door nazi's geroofd schilderij. nu.nl. 31 March 2015 [2 April 2015]. （原始內容存檔於2015-04-02）. 
  63. ^ Koninklijke familie bezit roofkunstwerk. [2015-04-01]. （原始內容存檔於2015-04-02）. 
  64. ^ Bradsher, Greg. Documenting Nazi Plunder of European Art. The National Archives of the United States. November 1997 [2022-07-26]. （原始內容存檔於2011-09-19）. 
  65. ^ 65.0 65.1 65.2 Spiegler, Howard. Recovering Nazi-Looted Art: Report from the Front Lines. Connecticut Journal of International Law. 2001. 
  66. ^ Provenance Research Project. The Met. [3 September 2021]. （原始內容存檔於2022-11-22）. 
  67. ^ Maintaining world-leading national museums and galleries, and supporting the museum sector. [23 December 2014]. （原始內容存檔於2008-09-06）. 
  68. ^ Yarrow, Andrew L. "A Lucrative Crime Grows Into a Costly Epidemic," （頁面存檔備份，存於互聯網檔案館） New York Times. March 20, 1990.
  69. ^ Rollason, Kevin. Art Sleuths on Nazi Trail. Winnipeg Free Press. February 7, 2013 [February 23, 2014]. （原始內容存檔於2014-03-06）. 
  70. ^ Everard, Myriam; Bosch, Mineke. Feminisme als oorlogstrofee: De vooroorlogse IAV-archieven in Moskou. Bosch, Mineke (編). Feminisme en Verbeelding Jaarboek voor Vrouwengeschiedenis [Feminism as a war trophy: The pre-war IAV archives in Moscow] 14. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Stichting beheer IISG. 1994: 193–200 [2022-07-26]. ISBN 978-90-6861-096-3. （原始內容存檔於2022-07-26） （荷蘭語）. 
  71. ^ de Haan, Francisca. Getting to the Source: A "Truly International" Archive for the Women's Movement(IAV, now IIAV): From its Foundation in Amsterdam in 1935 to the Return of its Looted Archives in 2003 (PDF). Journal of Women's History (Johns Hopkins University Press). Winter 2004, 16 (4): 148–172. S2CID 143990485. doi:10.1353/jowh.2004.0082. （原始內容 (PDF)存檔於28 April 2017）. 
  72. ^ de Haan, Francisca; Mevis, Annette. The IAV/IIAV's Archival Policy and Practice: Seventy Years of Collecting, Receiving, and Refusing Women's Archives (1935-2005). Wieringa, Saskia (編). Traveling Heritages: New Perspecitves on Collecting, Preserving, and Sharing Women's History. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press. 2008: 23–46. ISBN 978-90-5260-299-8. 
  73. ^ 73.0 73.1 Nazi looted art 'found in Munich' – German media. BBC News. 3 November 2013 [3 November 2013]. （原始內容存檔於2013-11-03）. 
  74. ^ Beck, Roland. Dominik Radlmaier spürt NS-Raubkunst in Nürnbergs Sammlungen auf. Schwäbisches Tagblatt. DPA. 23 January 2014 [21 January 2015] （德語）. 
  75. ^ "Lost Art" – Forschungsprojekt zur Ermittlung und Rückgabe NS-verfolgungsbedingt entzogener Kulturgüter. nuernberg.de. City of Nuremberg. [21 January 2015]. （原始內容存檔於2015-01-29） （德語）. 
  76. ^ Berendt, Joanna. Hopes Dashed Again in Hunt for Fabled Nazi Gold Train in Poland. The New York Times. 2015-12-15 [2016-02-16]. ISSN 0362-4331. （原始內容存檔於2015-12-16）. 
  77. ^ Nazi gold train: 'No evidence' of discovery in Poland – BBC News. BBC News. 15 December 2015 [2016-02-16]. （原始內容存檔於2015-12-15） （英國英語）. 
  78. ^ 78.0 78.1 Jewish Digital Cultural Recovery Project (JDCRP). Claims Conference/WRJO Looted Art and Cultural Property Initiative. [2021-05-06]. （原始內容存檔於2021-05-06） （美國英語）. 
  79. ^ Cultural Plunder by the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg. 5 February 2020 [6 May 2021]. （原始內容存檔於2022-11-19）. 
  80. ^ 80.0 80.1 80.2 JDCRP – Jewish Digital Cultural Recovery Project. [2021-05-06]. （原始內容存檔於2022-12-05） （美國英語）. 
  81. ^ Addendum. Austrian Commission Newsletter. January 2021: 21 –透過Commission for Provenance Research. 
  82. ^ 82.0 82.1 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Poland. MSZ: nie mamy informacji, gdzie jest "Portret młodzieńca" Rafaela, depesza PAP 01.08.2012 [Communiqué of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs: we have no new information about the painting]. MSZ in the Media. Polish Press Agency. [2 February 2014]. （原始內容存檔於2014-02-19） （波蘭語）. [Rafael's "Portrait of a Young Man" was not destroyed, as has been known[…]for years] 

進一步閱讀

[編輯]
  • Campbell, E. (2020). Claiming National Heritage: State Appropriation of Nazi Art Plunder in Postwar Western Europe. Journal of Contemporary History.
  • Edsel, Robert M. (Contributions by Brett Witter) (2009). Monuments Men: Allied Heroes, Nazi Thieves and the Greatest Treasure Hunt in History. Center Street. ISBN 978-1-59995-149-2
  • Edsel, Robert M. Rescuing Da Vinci. Laurel Publishing. 2006. ISBN 0-9774349-0-7. 
  • Aly, Götz (2007). Hitler's Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State. Metropolitan Books. ISBN 978-0-8050-7926-5
  • Feliciano, Hector (1997). The Lost Museum. New York: Harper Collins.
  • Hadden, R. L. (2008). "The Heringen Collection of the US Geological Survey Library, Reston, Virginia". Earth Sciences History Journal of the History of the Earth Sciences Society v.27, n.2, pp. 242–265.
  • Harclerode, Peter and Pittaway, Brendan (1999). The Lost Masters: WWII and the Looting of Europe's Treasurehouses. London: Orion Books.
  • Löhr, Hanns Christian (2005): Das Braune Haus der Kunst: Hitler und der Sonderauftrag Linz, Akademie-Verlag,ISBN 3-05-004156-0
  • Löhr, Hanns Christian (2018): Kunst als Waffe – Der Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg, Ideologie und Kunstraub im „Dritten Reich「, Gebr. Mann, ISBN 978-3-7861-2806-9.
  • Nicholas, Lynn (1994). The Rape of Europa. London: Macmillan Publishers.
  • O'Connor, Anne-Marie (2012). The Lady in Gold, The Extraordinary Tale of Gustav Klimt's Masterpiece, Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, ISBN 0-307-26564-1.
  • OSS Report: Activity of the Einsatzstab Rosenberg in France, 15 August 1945
  • Petropoulos, Jonathan (1996). Art as Politics in the Third Reich. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
  • Petropoulos, Jonathan (2000). The Faustian Bargain: The Art World in Nazi Germany. London: Penguin Press.
  • Roxan, David; Wanstall, Ken. The Rape of Art: The Story of Hitler's Plunder of the Great Masterpieces of Europe. New York: Coward-McCann. 1965. OCLC 846620. 
  • Schwarz, Birgit (2004). Hitler's Museum. Die Fotoalben Gemäldegalerie Linz, Wien, Böhlau Verlag. ISBN 3-205-77054-4
  • Simpson, Elizabeth (1997). The Spoils of War – World War II and Its Aftermath: The Loss, Reappearance, and Recovery of Cultural Property. New York: Harry N. Abrams in association with the Bard Graduate Center.
  • Slany, William Z. "U.S. Interagency Report on U.S. and Allied Wartime and Post Postwar Relations and Negotiations with Argentina, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and Turkey on Looted Gold and German External Assets." American University International Law Review 14, no. 1 (1998): 147–153.
  • Yeide, Nancy H. (2009). Beyond Dreams of Avarice: The Hermann Göring Collection. Laurel Publishing. ISBN 978-0-9774349-1-6 (Foreword by Robert M. Edsel)

外部鏈接

[編輯]
維基共享資源上的相關多媒體資源：納粹劫掠
取自 "https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=纳粹劫掠&oldid=84952792"